- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 16,409
- Reaction score
- 27,594
Yes, I know. Hence 'again'.Ummm news flash, Kraft already overruled Belichick on keeping Jimmy and trading Brady.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yes, I know. Hence 'again'.Ummm news flash, Kraft already overruled Belichick on keeping Jimmy and trading Brady.
And if he overruled Belichick, I think he's done as the HC of the NEP after this year. I can't imagine him allowing that to happen again.
No no and noUmmm news flash, Kraft already overruled Belichick on keeping Jimmy and trading Brady.
It was a real quickie in the way he did the release.
Oh wonderful, Kraft is starting to meddle again...
If reports about Kraft being the one to ultimately release Brown are correct, I have to say that’s a pretty ballsy move considering his sexual indiscretions in the offseason. Pun fully intended.
Do we know for a fact Kraft made Bill trade Jimmy G?Yeah. That's never happened before.
That's what I thought to.I thought Reiss reported that Kraft called up BB and after the conversation they both agreed to dump Brown. Is there new reporting that says Kraft did it without talking to BB?
No no and no
I think Belichick understands sometimes business decisions get made and 'the brand' requires protecting well enough that he wouldn't go to the wall over this one if that were the case.
Bullcrap. It’s been proven to be fake.Yes yes and yes. I know the resident homers on here like to act like the Seth Wickersham piece was all fake but that’s not reality.
No all that’s happened is people who don’t know the facts have had time to speculate, make things up and find a way to be critical.I thought Reiss reported that Kraft called up BB and after the conversation they both agreed to dump Brown. Is there new reporting that says Kraft did it without talking to BB?
What "brand"?
Good.
Otherwise, right now you'd be cheering on our starting QB Garropolo and hoping the Pats can win Banner #6.
Bullcrap. It’s been proven to be fake.
There is no way ever that Belichick would have traded Brady to keep garapolo and anyone who thinks so is an idiot.
John Lynch asked the question and Belichick told him he was crazy.
Good owners stay in their lane. Good owners do not make football decisions. Good owners do not divorce themselves from all situations involving the team. He is the boss.Brady is the franchise- that's different. I can see him getting involved there. It's like if the Bulls owner prevented Phil Jackson from trading Michael Jordan away. Antonio Brown is just a cog. Unless it involves Brady, I'd prefer Kraft to stay out.
No, that’s a good point.I mean I suppose we can agree that Rosenhaus most probably had to know, right ? So he could have at least mentioned that there are negotiations about a civil suit going on without giving any details.
Or is that already too much information ?
He didn’t get sued so that means everything he said and other stuff he didn’t are true. Idiotic point of view.Amazing how Wickersham didn’t get sued for such a fabricated hit piece on them. God forbid you admit Brady and Belichick have had tension in their relationship. They have been together 20 years it happens. You homers that dig your head in the sand at anything that conflicts with your Patriots world view are insufferable.
| 50 | 3K |
| 40 | 3K |
| 16 | 1K |
| 63 | 7K |
| 14 | 938 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











