- Joined
- Dec 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 1,819
let me guess, the other player who may've witnessed something is Ben Rapelisberger?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How is a well-researched article detailing a vast array of documented problems surrounding Brown, including cases of aggressive outbursts, uncouth sexual advances, and unpaid bills, some unfair destruction of Brown's character?
He owes multiple contractors money, got a fish tank and let them rot and die (animal abuse), threw furniture out of a window onto a busy street, lashed out at a woman and injured her arm, and approached a female contractor in his house wearing nothing but a hand-towel over his crotch.
It wasn't an character assassination; it was a well-researched and corroborated article detailing the many troubling issues surrounding Brown. If anyone destroyed Brown's character it was Brown himself, not the SI article which simply documented the many actions that Brown himself did.
If I drive drunk and kill a family, and the media arrives at the scene to take photos and write a story, was it the media who destroyed my character by reporting what I did, or was it I who destroyed my own character by doing those things?
How is a well-researched article detailing a vast array of documented problems surrounding Brown, including cases of aggressive outbursts, uncouth sexual advances, and unpaid bills, some unfair destruction of Brown's character?
He owes multiple contractors money, got a fish tank and let them rot and die (animal abuse), threw furniture out of a window onto a busy street, lashed out at a woman and injured her arm, and approached a female contractor in his house wearing nothing but a hand-towel over his crotch.
It wasn't an character assassination; it was a well-researched and corroborated article detailing the many troubling issues surrounding Brown. If anyone destroyed Brown's character it was Brown himself, not the SI article which simply documented the many actions that Brown himself did.
If I drive drunk and kill a family, and the media arrives at the scene to take photos and write a story, was it the media who destroyed my character by reporting what I did, or was it I who destroyed my own character by doing those things?
The #1 answer to: "when is it not a crime to answer the door in a little towel"So is answering the door in a little towel when I ordered pizza a crime?
I read AG has kept AB strapped down at TB12 massaging his glutes and working on his pliability. Word is AG asked for cash up front though.Patriots have kept Brown pretty damn quiet this past week. Whatever they are doing it’s working for now.
The only real question is does owing people money, doing what he did to women, disqualify him from playing football? Or any other job?
How can you call this a corroborated article when they only listed one side of those stories. Was AB or any of his assistants interviewed for the article to corroborate everything said? Were the piranhas interviewed? Nonsense.How is a well-researched article detailing a vast array of documented problems surrounding Brown, including cases of aggressive outbursts, uncouth sexual advances, and unpaid bills, some unfair destruction of Brown's character?
It wasn't an character assassination; it was a well-researched and corroborated article detailing the many troubling issues surrounding Brown.
How is a well-researched article detailing a vast array of documented problems surrounding Brown, including cases of aggressive outbursts, uncouth sexual advances, and unpaid bills, some unfair destruction of Brown's character?
I agree, not sure why anyone would try to defend AB's behavior. Just because he's on the Pats now?...shallowHow is a well-researched article detailing a vast array of documented problems surrounding Brown, including cases of aggressive outbursts, uncouth sexual advances, and unpaid bills, some unfair destruction of Brown's character?
He owes multiple contractors money, got a fish tank and let them rot and die (animal abuse), threw furniture out of a window onto a busy street, lashed out at a woman and injured her arm, and approached a female contractor in his house wearing nothing but a hand-towel over his crotch.
It wasn't an character assassination; it was a well-researched and corroborated article detailing the many troubling issues surrounding Brown. If anyone destroyed Brown's character it was Brown himself, not the SI article which simply documented the many actions that Brown himself did.
If I drive drunk and kill a family, and the media arrives at the scene to take photos and write a story, was it the media who destroyed my character by reporting what I did, or was it I who destroyed my own character by doing those things?
He’s being rewarded for being good at his job, not for how he conducts himself in his personal life.It doesn't, but he shouldn't be rewarded for ****ting on people in general and for being a cancer to society.
I agree, not sure why anyone would try to defend AB's behavior. Just because he's on the Pats now?...shallow
So is answering the door in a little towel when I ordered pizza a crime?
That is the issueThey will when people start getting penalized because some ex-lover files a revenge lawsuit. Which you can be sure is how most of the rank and file of the NFLPA see the Antonio Brown situation.
I've just finished Jeff Howe's well written and LONG article over at the Athletic. To make that long story short, here's the thing. There IS language in the CBA and precedence to put AB on the exempt list if he THINKS there is a possibility that the charges are true. Doesn't matter if its not a criminal case. It doesn't matter if there is conflicting evidence. He doesn't even have to say he believes the charges are true. He can put him on the exempt list merely on the PRESUMPTION that something happened (sound familiar), and keep him there until the case is resolved in court.
If this is the case, then I can't see a way AB remains on the field past Sunday....at best. Usually the league wants to make these kinds of decisions before the first practice of the week, so there is a possibility he plays this week.
By all indications, AB is at practice today. It's pretty likely that he plays on Sunday.
By all indications, AB is at practice today. It's pretty likely that he plays on Sunday.
True, but this didn't happen under Moral Emperor Roger Goodell's watch...Ray Lewis killed a guy and still played. Maybe two guys. He also beat up all the members of first take
The pats will play it safe for now but i’m sure they would love an end to this already.