PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Antonio Brown


Status
Not open for further replies.
She accused him of an affair, not rape. You can't name any of the rape accusers because they weren't so vilified.

Doesn't have to be a rape accuser. My larger point was how people vilify any kind of accuser. Even I do it myself and we all shouldn't...but human nature.
 
Schefter said there are rumblings he goes on commish exempt list until sorted out.
Doesn't make sense to me as court case would take over a year probably
Damn if he is innocent and it was consensual that be crazy.
 
Bullcrap. They hired a stripper and told crude jokes. You know, the sorts of things college students do.
If you believe that, then you believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. Read the trial transcripts. "Told crude jokes"...thanks, you actually game me a real laugh before going to bed. Night.
 
Wow. A lawyer claiming his client passed a polygraph. LOL! That's isn't worth the paper it's filed on.

Considering how notoriously reliable polygraphs are as well.
 
There’s little if any evidence to suggest polygraphs accurately detect lies
 
Just like BB had no idea Luck retired. Right?

Yeah I would say we have no idea if the Pats knew or not. I could see the Pats getting a lot of (unfair) criticism for trading for AB if they admit they knew. “What, you don’t care about Me Too and you traded for a someone who could be a rapist, don’t you care about character, Patriot way is Bull, etc.”

So if they knew or didn’t know, I think they deny it either way.
 
Chiefs didn't cut tyreke, why should we get rid of ab??? It's football, I know I sound like an ******* but there are so many bad guys in this league.
 
If you believe that, then you believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. Read the trial transcripts. "Told crude jokes"...thanks, you actually game me a real laugh before going to bed. Night.
I'd rather believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny than believe Crystal Mangum like you do.
 
That is not the basic gist of what you were getting at.




So you're a dishonest poster.


I see your confusion. I was saying to take the accusation seriously by considering that the alleged victim is telling the truth and proceeding woth fact finding.
 

Was asking my gf this as she works in criminal intelligence.

Why in the flying **** do law enforcement groups, from local PD to FBI and CIA all use a polygraph in their screening process, when they've been thoroughly discounted and aren't even admissable in a court?

I just don't get it. There has to be something I'm missing.
 
The civil case could go on for years. The text message doesn't prove anything (not a model of clarity and may just be trashing her after consensual sex and threats). The answer from Brown will deny most of the allegations and counter with any actions admitted were consensual. He said/she said. Prove your claim more likely than not.

She can expect her electronic existence (social media, cellphone and e-mail) to be scrutinized in discovery to the max. If she deletes any records and that is identified, then she can expect adverse inferences at trial in terms of what the deleted records might have indicated. Discovery, forensics, expert witnesses, motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment, and then, much later, maybe a trial. Nothing happens this year and depending on the docket this could stretch into 2021 and beyond before it arrives at a decision.

As an FYI for those viewing this and concluding these allegations are to be accepted as gospel in describing what actually happened and how this will play out, I invite you to read this attached case. More or less, mom pimps out very young minor kids for sexual pleasure of former Mayor of Waterbury, CT. Mom then claims victim status and files civil case against Waterbury, CT and ex-mayor on some of the same theories here claiming substantial damages (the ex-mayor was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt in 2001, but even with the conviction the civil case continued for 3 - 5 years).

If the NFL steps into cases based on allegations in a civil complaint alone, then it better up its legal budget. No video and no criminal charges? It would effectively become an investigator for the claims and defenses of the respective parties and a witness to the cases as they move through the civil process.
 
If you believe that, then you believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. Read the trial transcripts. "Told crude jokes"...thanks, you actually game me a real laugh before going to bed. Night.
That’s exactly what happened and I don’t recall at this point how involved the three specific accused even were in that.

Your credibility is tanking fast, you should definitely call it a night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top