Patriots IRONY

[DaBruinz]

The Patriots beat the Jets 38-14 and a non-issue with a video camera gets turned into the biggest Clusterf**K to hit the league since the Denver and 49ers cheating scandal.

What do the Pats do? They come right back and put up another 38-14 win on the Chargers, who their best player says that 9 times out of 10 they beat the Pats...

Hmm.. guess their best player would be wrong since the Pats have beat them 2 straight and tonight wasn't even a contest with the Pats leading 24-0 at the half.

 

[BradyisGod]

add on to that, that in the game where the they "stole" the tape, the team sucked.

when they had no "cameras", the team was supposed to be good.

 

[JaredOfNazareth]

Is that why the Patriots went for it on fourth and one on the Charger three yard line with Morris? That was awesome!

 

[PATRIOT64]

Its a bit different but kind of reminds me of 2003 when Buffalo won in a 31-0 win week 1 following the Lawyer Milloy fiasco - then in week 16 of that season we won 31-0

 

[patchick]

Is that why the Patriots went for it on fourth and one on the Charger three yard line with Morris? That was awesome!

A little OT, but I thought that was an obvious situation to go for it. Given the time remaining, I would have much rather left the Chargers with a 97-yard field than tacked on 3 points (that still left it a 3-score game) and then kicked off.

 

[Crazy Patriot Guy]

A little OT, but I thought that was an obvious situation to go for it. Given the time remaining, I would have much rather left the Chargers with a 97-yard field than tacked on 3 points (that still left it a 3-score game) and then kicked off.

Yeah I thought the same thing at the time.

The only difference a FG makes is that the Chargers need 3 TDs instead of 2 TDs and a FG. Both are very unlikely at that point.

Like you said, I'd rather be up 17 with the Chargers at the 3 yard line than up 20 and they possibly run back the kickoff.