Golic and salisbury on NFL Live

[SVN]

tonite said this is no big a deal but the commish might have to come down hard because of the precedent he set not necessarily because the punishment fits the crime.
Both were asked if this puts in question their superbowl seasons and wins. Both of them said absolutely not - doesnt mean a thing , they were great teams.

Golic added that BB's rep does take a hit because people are going to wonder why he did it . Salisbury said he is still one of the top 5 coaches all time and no disrespect to chuck noll but BB on the 70's steelers wouldve won 4 SB's as well.
wingo was trying to say that BB is the master of half time adjustments -salisbury said - its hardly enough to go thru tapes and make players understand and play or something of that sort.

 

[Keegs]

tonite said this is no big a deal but the commish might have to come down hard because of the precedent he set not necessarily because the punishment fits the crime.
Both were asked if this puts in question their superbowl seasons and wins. Both of them said absolutely not - doesnt mean a thing , they were great teams.

Golic added that BB's rep does take a hit because people are going to wonder why he did it . Salisbury said he is still one of the top 5 coaches all time and no disrespect to chuck noll but BB on the 70's steelers wouldve won 4 SB's as well.
wingo was trying to say that BB is the master of half time adjustments -salisbury said - its hardly enough to go thru tapes and make players understand and play or something of that sort.

good for Sean. Not so much for Golic.
While i am a huge Mike and Mike fan, I think he was being a ********.

This morning when talking with Greeny, they were both saying how it's blatant cheating and horrible and blowing it way out of proportions.

Now when he's with Sean, he agrees with him more that it's no big deal and only adds that it might make BB look bad.

But what am i thinking? these espn "analysts" make multiple predictions and display different positions on arguments all the time so that they can always be right in one way or the other.

Jerkoffs.

 

[SVN]

good for Sean. Not so much for Golic.
While i am a huge Mike and Mike fan, I think he was being a ********.

This morning when talking with Greeny, they were both saying how it's blatant cheating and horrible and blowing it way out of proportions.

Now when he's with Sean, he agrees with him more that it's no big deal and only adds that it might make BB look bad.

But what am i thinking? these espn "analysts" make multiple predictions and display different positions on arguments all the time so that they can always be right in one way or the other.

Jerkoffs.

you maybe right. all these analysts decide prematurely what they are going to say and match it up such that it contradicts one another ..e.g schelereth saying stuff yesterday but disappearing today.

 

[DisgruntledTunaFan]

tonite said this is no big a deal but the commish might have to come down hard because of the precedent he set not necessarily because the punishment fits the crime.
Both were asked if this puts in question their superbowl seasons and wins. Both of them said absolutely not - doesnt mean a thing , they were great teams.

Golic added that BB's rep does take a hit because people are going to wonder why he did it . Salisbury said he is still one of the top 5 coaches all time and no disrespect to chuck noll but BB on the 70's steelers wouldve won 4 SB's as well.
wingo was trying to say that BB is the master of half time adjustments -salisbury said - its hardly enough to go thru tapes and make players understand and play or something of that sort.

Exactly-it's alot like taking an open book test. Open Book DOESN'T mean that you don't have to study for a test, b/c everything's right in front of you, it just simply means if you forgot a detail, you know where to look it up.

Pt being there's ALOT to digest in the 15 min of halftime-going through that video for signs would be useless b/c there's ALOT of other problems to mull through anyways.

 

[PatriotsReign]

tonite said this is no big a deal but the commish might have to come down hard because of the precedent he set not necessarily because the punishment fits the crime.
Both were asked if this puts in question their superbowl seasons and wins. Both of them said absolutely not - doesnt mean a thing , they were great teams.

Golic added that BB's rep does take a hit because people are going to wonder why he did it . Salisbury said he is still one of the top 5 coaches all time and no disrespect to chuck noll but BB on the 70's steelers wouldve won 4 SB's as well.
wingo was trying to say that BB is the master of half time adjustments -salisbury said - its hardly enough to go thru tapes and make players understand and play or something of that sort.

It was also great to hear John Gruden (on another ESPN or NFL Network show) say there are "more important things to worry about and this isn't a big deal..."