- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 6,147
- Reaction score
- 4,360
......and the Pats failed to convert third down, would the smart play still be to go for it on 4th down?
Obviously a successful conversion would mean game over.
But then it comes down to this. Would you rather........
A.) The Falcons have the ball at their own 1 but only need a field goal to tie.
OR
B.) The Falcons receive a standard kick off following a Pats field goal and need a 3 points to tie (and would be in four down territory prior to FG range).
THe other thing to consider in scenario A is that if the Pats defense were to hold they would get great field position in a situation in which a field goal would win it.
Obviously we're glad they didn't face this scenario, but just curious how you'd want the Pats to play the situation IF they did have to face 4th and goal in OT.
Obviously a successful conversion would mean game over.
But then it comes down to this. Would you rather........
A.) The Falcons have the ball at their own 1 but only need a field goal to tie.
OR
B.) The Falcons receive a standard kick off following a Pats field goal and need a 3 points to tie (and would be in four down territory prior to FG range).
THe other thing to consider in scenario A is that if the Pats defense were to hold they would get great field position in a situation in which a field goal would win it.
Obviously we're glad they didn't face this scenario, but just curious how you'd want the Pats to play the situation IF they did have to face 4th and goal in OT.












