- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,096
- Reaction score
- 22,717
This current team has virtually no connection to the earlier title teams, It's not a dynasty when you go ten years between championships
Brady, Wilfork, Bellichick & Kraft say HELLO!!!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This current team has virtually no connection to the earlier title teams, It's not a dynasty when you go ten years between championships
Steelers are still on the top, in terms of dynasty.
Patriots need a few more rings to equal them. (IF only those 2 SB against the Giants....)
I agree. The patriots have been the best team in the NFL this century and have dominated the AFCE for that period. The steelers were the best team in the NFL and dominated the NFL for the period of their dynasty. IMHO, the year that would have clinched it for the patriots were 2006 and 2007, clearly part of the 2001-2004 dynasty.Steelers are still on the top, in terms of dynasty.
Patriots need a few more rings to equal them. (IF only those 2 SB against the Giants....)
The Zhou Dynasty was actually several times more impressive than the current Patriots Dynasty. They ruled for over 800 years.
Disagree, definitely one continuous dynasty. They turn the roster over 15-20% per year because of the salary cap system they're in. But to reach the AFC Championship game in 02, 03, 05, 07, 08, 11, 13, 14, & 15, as well as the SB in 02, 03, 05, 08, 11, & 15, under the same HC/QB/owner, is one dynasty. There was never a fall-off or re-building period in that entire span.This current team has virtually no connection to the earlier title teams, It's not a dynasty when you go ten years between championships
"I don't consider them a dynasty at all." -Jerry Rice
Disagree, definitely one continuous dynasty. They turn the roster over 15-20% per year because of the salary cap system they're in. But to reach the AFC Championship game in 02, 03, 05, 07, 08, 11, 13, 14, & 15, as well as the SB in 02, 03, 05, 08, 11, & 15, under the same HC/QB/owner, is one dynasty. There was never a fall-off or re-building period in that entire span.
It's also the greatest dynasty ever cause of the consistent excellence even in years they didn't win it all. SF didn't have the winning pct or number of playoff/championship appearances during their 5/15 run, and their last SB was with a different HC and QB. NE was also 3 plays away from winning 3 more Lombardi's - in 07 (Indy), 08 (NYG), and 11 (NYG).
Who's Jerry Rice?
Brady, Wilfork, Bellichick & Kraft say HELLO!!!
Brady, Wilfork, Bellichick & Kraft say HELLO!!!
I don't understand, are you saying only QB to win one with 52 guys, and then win another with a completely different set of 52?Brady is the only QB in NFL history to win Super Bowls with 52 different players around him.
Has any QB in history won separate Super Bowls with 52 different players?
Has any QB in history won separate Super Bowls with 52 different players?
Your math is a bit off. Rosters were 52 players in 2004 and Vince Wilfork was on that team along with Brady. So 50 total players. Not too shabby, still.
Brady is the only QB in NFL history to win Super Bowls with 52 different players around him.