Dome inflation. Indy has actually had to have two placekickers at times on the roster due to Adam's inability to put KOs deep. Fans may not care, but there is no way Bill would have kept Vinatieri around through that, nor should they have. Moving on was clearly the right decision.
Well, the numbers are what they are, but, yes, I actually cited the opportunity to pile up Dome-aided stats as a reason for his moving on in my first post in this thread.
Since Gostkowski has been so effective, any other debate is moot since it would hinge on arguing intangibles; Gostkowski has, for example, never been called on to make a kick like the one Adam made in the snow bowl (the first kick to tie the game) nor has he ever either had to make a 48 yarder to win one SB with no time left on the clock or a 41 yarder with a few seconds left to win another. Since Gostkowski has never been called on to do anything that major, we don't know what we might or might not have lost, just as we don't know what Adam might or might not have done under the same, purely hypothetical, circumstances.
And, yes, the Pats pay Allen a lot less than the Colts pay McAfee to do two jobs, but that too is relative to things we can't measure.
Bottom line for me? I wish we'd kept #4, but I can't make a thoroughly rational argument on the numbers because things have worked out fine with Gostkowski. Vinatieri's going to Canton and I hope the Pats retire his number when he does, just as I hope he misses every goddam kick he tries this Sunday.