How the rule is normally called: Ball is in the air, defender isn't looking back at the ball, minor contact/minor hindrance can be called. Did this play hit that threshold? Watching the replay in slo-mo multiple times:
- At about the 13 yard line, Boyce turns his head around looking for the ball (he has his head turned, looking toward the ball the remainder of the play).
- The Cleveland player, about 1/2 yard behind him, does not turn his head toward the ball (he never turns his head around on the play whatsoever).
- At about the 11 yard line both players are hand checking each other. Both players have their arms fully extended touching each others jersies (how much pushing is going on? It's hard to tell if there is any).
- At about the 7 to 8 yard line with both of them extending their arms onto each other, the Cleveland player grabs/tugs Boyce at the top front of his left shoulder briefly. Video shows it slows Boyce down to a small degree.
- At about the 6 the Cleveland player hooks Boyce's arm (near the wrist area) for only a fraction of a second.
- Both players disengage any tangential contact with each other around the 5 yard line.
- About 1 yard deep in the endzone the Cleveland player puts his right hand on Boyce's back, his left hand around Boyce's left side and onto his chest. Replay does not show any hindrance of forward motion of Boyce from this.
- About 4 yards deep in the endzone the ball goes off the tips Boyce's fingers, with the pass about a half foot too long (would have required a super amazing finger tip catch otherwise). The Cleveland player appears not to be directly touching Boyce at this point --- though his left hand is around Boyce's shoulder and may be touching his front shoulder.
That is exact or pretty damn close to how it happened.
I would say overall it wasn't a lot that the Cleveland player did. But I don't have a problem with the call because the grab, which is illegal, directly resulted in the ball not hitting Boyce right square in the hands. I don't really care what the rule exactly is, I'd prefer justice by way of rules. IMHO a play on the other side of the field that is much more PI but the ball was never going over there, that is an infraction of the letter of the rules. But that would also give a team the ball on the 1 yard line -- that is not justice. This call was a direct 1 for 1 event (even if it was "not much to the grab"). He grabbed Boyce, it made Boyce miss having the ball laid right into his hands, the penalty results in the Patriots having a chance at a TD (though perfect justice would put the ball at the 1 yard line with the same amount of downs left from the down the original play occured, imho).
Tim