- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 33,416
- Reaction score
- 19,177
I have always been of the belief that the Franchise Tag was intended to allow teams time to re-sign their best and most important players to long term deals, and not simply to prevent them from hitting the free market. I have always supported the tags because i thought that was their utility but if they were simply meant to allow teams to screw their best players then I think they suck and the players should never have allowed the owners that option. Ultimately that's the players mistake for allowing the tags in the CBA and that's the way it goes and welker is paying a big price for it.
Again, though, remember the status quo ante before the franchise tag: unrestricted FA took six years.
"Fixing" the franchise tag, IMO, doesn't require eliminating it. It should, however, mandate that teams be required to make good-faith efforts to sign the player long-term.












