Rang's Top 32 plus 10...

[Seneschal2]

Thought it worthy to post this, considering the Pats first three selections (17/28/33) may be among his 42. Feedback appreciated...

From Rob Rang:

Anyone can recognize talent. I'm most interested in identifying players who, along with that talent, possess the maturity, intelligence and work ethic to become NFL stars. If I was building a team from scratch with only the current draft class to choose from, this is the order in which I'd select them.

Rang's Big Board: Top 32 plus 10 - NFL - CBSSports.com - NFLDraftScout.com

 

[bucky]

I wonder if BB thinks as highly of Mark Ingram as some of the draftniks.

Overall, I'd say this list is very close to how I would rate them. The QBs are about in the right spots, so are the OTs.

I think somewhere in the low 20s, the 1st round talent ends in this draft.

 

[sbpatfan]

I wonder if BB thinks as highly of Mark Ingram as some of the draftniks.

Overall, I'd say this list is very close to how I would rate them. The QBs are about in the right spots, so are the OTs.

I think somewhere in the low 20s, the 1st round talent ends in this draft.

It's best not to talk about Mark Ingram. The board flips their **** at the mere mention of his name.

 

[patchick]

It's best not to talk about Mark Ingram. The board flips their **** at the mere mention of his name.

Guilty as charged. I think we're so touchy because we know it's a real possibility. (I actually think very highly of Ingram, I just don't want an RB at #17, period.)

 

[townes]

Guilty as charged. I think we're so touchy because we know it's a real possibility. (I actually think very highly of Ingram, I just don't want an RB at #17, period.)

While i'm not thrilled at the idea of RB at #17 I really just want Pro Bowl quality players with their high picks.

 

[Water Boy]

I don't like the references of Aldon Smith to John Pierre-Paul. JPP was way more inexperienced and RAW.

I still have serious concerns about JJ Watt's ability to be SATPOA against the run as a 3-4 DE.

I don't understand the knock on Kerrigan's "hand play" ? 30 sacks isn't good enough indicator of his ability to rush the passer?

 

[patchick]

I don't understand the knock on Kerrigan's "hand play" ? 30 sacks isn't good enough indicator of his ability to rush the passer?

That surprised me, too. To my eyes, Kerrigan's violent hands are his very best asset.

 

[ZoisKing]

Kerrigan is the obvious choice for me at 17. He has been overevaluated, but that should work in our favor. I think he's a superb choice in the middle of the 1st round.

That being said, we won't pick him. We'll most likely take a defensive end there, or trade up a few spots to get him.