Nov 12, 2010 - I've got a pet peeve about these "Power Rankings" that media types feel compelled to put out each week during the season. It really doesn't matter the sport, all of them are pretty much the same.
You know the deal -- the writer ranks the teams in the league from top to bottom. Good concept in theory, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired.
Perhaps there should be some sort of explanation with them, that tells you the criteria involved in coming up with the list each week. Does the ranking indicate how good (or bad) the team was that week, or overall that season?
I'll give you an example. Last week the Patriots sat at 6-1 -- all alone with the best record in the NFL. That prompted many creators of these power rankings to place the Patriots at the top spot. Were the Patriots, in fact, the best team in the NFL at that time? I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone -- even the most diehard, footy-pajama-wearing Patriots fan -- that could look you in the eye and say that New England was the best team in the NFL. They probably weren't even the best team that week, coming off the win over Minnesota.
Yet, simply because they had the best record seven weeks into the season, the experts felt compelled to put them atop their list. Record was the only reason.
This week, after a loss to the Cleveland Browns, the Patriots are still tied for the best record in the NFL, but have plummeted across the board in the "power rankings." For example, Peter King dropped them to 5th this week. FOX dropped them to 6th. NBC had them 7th. All of those outlets had the Patriots at number one last week.
So you're telling me that the team YOU anointed as the "best" team in the NFL last week, is now the seventh best team a week later? A wild swing like that after only one game can only mean you have no clue about what you're doing. That, or the whole thing is simply a reactionary farce designed to get people talking.
Shoot, I fell for it again.