patsfaninpittsburgh
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,054
- Reaction score
- 0
Let's see.........we could have had Bolden (I predict at least 7 catches for him and one TD Sunday. Oh by the way.....WASN'T HE A FOURTH ROUNDER TO THE CARDS FOR THE RAVENS????? Branch or Bolden, Branch or Bolden? Tough choice? Major F.O. FAIL!
How about Santonio Holmes for a fifth? Brandon Jackson nobody here wanted. He only caught five on us with a very inconsistent QB....the shame of it all. Bet he still winds up leading the league in receptions in 2010.
How about the other Seahawk receiver who got away...T.J. Instead of Branch? No brainer.
If Moss was not in our future, they should have dumped him and taken T.O. for a couple years. Yep T.O. is way better than Branch. He has been a pretty good soldier the last couple years.
Well we now have three wide receivers under 5'10" (please don't give me any crap that it does not make a difference) and by the way again, I hope Gronk can do some deep fly patterns. Welker did benefit from Moss. How will peg leg Mr. "The Pats suck I am bustin out!" Branch help. They must be building a camp fire in Foxboro so before practice BB can introduce Branch again and lead them in a "Kumbayah" sing around.
Moss has 4 TD's for 2010 already. He had 13 last year in an off-year for Brady. Tell me if DB is going to do 9 TD's to at least break even? Nyet! So Felger and Borges and the rest of the idiots who say Moss was not a major positive factor in our offense, go pound sand. You got your wish. You little smurf guy WR is now home. Moss was supposedly Team disruptive but yet Branch craps on the Pats and he comes back for a forth rounder with one good leg? Nice job F.O. Yea!
DW Toys
Moderators
It appears we have a big mess in aisle 42.
Please send help.












