Re: Idle thoughts....
1. I can't understand the threads where people are trying to figure out if we are still in position to get a bye or not. For God's sake, we aren't even half way through the season. Those threads are MEANINGLESS. No one knows how the rest of the season will go. We can wind up 14-2....or NOT. The same can be said of the rest of league. If the Oakland and Bill wins can teach us ANYTHING....you cannot count on ANY win in the NFL...or loss.
That seems a bit harsh. People generally like to speculate. When done with critical thinking and insight, it can also be pretty interesting. I will agree that being definitive about future outcomes seems a little silly.
4. I know there has been a thread about our Safety play, but I can't help myself. We are getting the best safety play we have seen in the BB era. Though Rodney was the BEST S to play, the combination of McGowan and Merriweather is. IMHO. better than Wilson and Harrison. My only concern here is how long McGowan can survive his reckless style. Beyond that, with Chung's development and Sanders' (when healthy) steady play, we have DEPTH, positional flexibility, as well as talent in our safety unit. It will only get better as the season wears on.
Totally agree and you want your safety play to be top notch heading into the playoffs. Strong play up the middle (Wilfork, Mayo, Meriweather, McGowan) doesn't guarantee success, but it sure as heck reduces the likelihood of failure.
5. IMHO, Matt Light was performing at a VERY high level before his injury. He STONED John Abrahams, and WAS stoning EDummerville before he got hurt. Supposedly these are just the kind of DE's who give him trouble, but somehow they DIDN'T. Yes it is nice to see Volmer do well in his debut on the left side, but I think we should all take that giant step back to reality and understand that the Seabass era is still a ways away. Let me see him swallow Dwight Freeney up in a Dome setting before I anoint him the second coming of Jackie Slater. Most OTs will look good playing against DEs in the snow. The fact is that when he gets healthy, Matt Light will be the starting LT for the Pats...and that will be for the BEST.
Agree to a point but that's about it. Light is still a solid player who fits very well with this line and this offense. However, Light has made 2 critical mistakes that resulted in 2 TDs and almost turned 2 home wins into crushing losses. These were mental/mechanics, not just getting beat physically.
Also, Abraham and Dummerville are not the speed types that give Light fits. Freeney, Suggs, Merriman (pre roids withdrawl) were problematic. That is why I think the Pats are looking for long-armed guys like Vollmer. Britt and O'Callaghan didn't have the footwork needed to excel. If Vollmer does, he can just escort speed guys upfield while still guarding against a spin move.
In the same vein, Nick Kazcur CONTINUES to be undervalued by fans. We continue to ignore the fact that he is going to be here for the long run. Fans might not value him, but the coaching staff CLEARLY does. Maybe its time to give them some credit....and Nick too.
Kazcur was frustrating because he would have one complete whiff a game that would get Brady killed. Seemed to be a problem with concentration which is always scary come playoff time. Fortunately he seemed to be more consistent last year (and so far this year). That likely earned him his extension and spot on the right side for the next few years.
The real story is how the Pats might start to use the OL talent they have on down the road. Mark Levoir is also someone who has to be reckoned with. Maybe as Seabass develops (as in NEXT year) either Light or Kazcur moves to RG to replace the oft injured Steve Neal, who I don't think will be be back next year. I remember years ago reading a scouting report that opined that while Matt Light can be a good LT (and he has been), he had the potential to be an All Pro G. It will be interesting to see how it pans out. That being said, I believe that nothing will drastically change in the OL rotation THIS YEAR
I really have no clue how this is going to play out. With Vollmer getting productive snaps and Levoir coming back, finding OL reps among good players is a nice problem to have. Add in the probable OT depth in the 2010 draft and the Pats have plenty of options.
11. Finally as one of those who was singing the praises of Ron Brace all through training camp, his lack of playing time this late into the season, has to be troubling. I thought he'd at least be a key factor on GL and short yardage D, but Pryor has seemingly flown right by him on the depth chart.
I didn't like Brace that early in the draft, but I understand it. He needed work on his technique coming out of BC (like most linemen do) and apparently he didn't take full advantage of the opportunities in camp. Hopefully he realizes the opportunity he has and steps up.
While it is hard to understand Belichick's intentions, I would imagine that the players who work their way onto the field love this guy. For every Brace, Springs or Galloway, there is a Pryor, McGowan or Edelman. The culture in the locker room didn't happen by accident or magic.