upstater1 said:
fleabit, you show a lot of class knocking the Pats while the Pats fans on this thread are not biting on the ref excuse. Even worse, you don't even know the rules of football.
1. The tuck rule is an actual rule.
2. It doesn't matter if the ball went out inside or outside the pylon. It landed beyond the goalline. The goalline extends outward infinitely. There is no out of bounds when a ball flies into the end zone. I've seen this called a hundred times. It's always a touchback because there is no out of bounds when the runner has the ball in the field of play. The lines in the end zone are only there for receivers.
I'm classy in the threads where decent, if even disgruntled, Pats fans are reasonable and friendly. I've already said it several times: The Pats are a great team, have proved it, have no quit, and played an awesome game. Turnovers killed 'em, plain and simple.
As far as the ball and the goaline: It actually has to PASS OVER the goaline. He got walloped at the 2 or so, and the ball looked to go pretty much sidways. There was certainly no camera angle that showed it actually went over the goaline. Unless you are completely dense, you must know that if the ball goes out in the field of play, it belongs to the team that possessed it last, at that spot where it went out.
Don't get snippy.. had it been a TD instead of an INT, you wouldn't need to worry about it at all eh? Fair call imo, I saw nothing in the replays (and neither did the refs) that indicated otherwise.
The tuck rule was a gift, only the completely blind could think otherwise. Or the complete homer Of course, had it been the Broncos, yea.. I'd be a complete homer about it as well, so I don't fault you there.