PromisedLand said:
I don't disagree that Russell was the greatest. Too often we forget great champions because their time has passed. I always thought Havlicek was forgotten way too soon.
I respect you for that.
I do disagree that Bird wasn't the best during his time. Magic was a great guard, maybe the greatest along with Oscar. But he didn't change the guard position. Before Bird no forward ever controlled the game from that position. I never heard of point forward before Bird came along. To say someone is the best based on championships is misleading. Look at the players Magic had playing with him. The year before Magic arrived in LA, they were beaten in the playoffs by Seattle who would win the championship. The year before Bird arrived in Boston they were 29-53 for 5th place in the Atlantic, no playoffs, not even close. The next year with rookie Bird, 61-21 and first in Atlantic Division. That was with no Parrish or McHale. They would be beaten by Philly who would go to the championship game.
What I actually said was:
Bird was arguably not even the greatest player of his era.
Note the word "arguably". That means you could
make the case that he was not. I still believe that to be true. I believe there is a very good case to be made for Magic too.
I said this simply to support my main point, that Bird was not dominant in his era the way Russell was in his. That Russell was able to overcome Goliath not once, but 9 times out of 10 is not only amazing, it's almost unbelievable!