- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
efin98 thinks julio lugo is a good short stop. that's all you need to know about him.lol
hahaha what? Seriously?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.efin98 thinks julio lugo is a good short stop. that's all you need to know about him.lol
yes totally serious lolhahaha what? Seriously?
i'll tell you what, he better be playing in all 4 games and i expect him to play at least 2 quarters in all of em. If not, then i dont see how we can start him.
You didn't read the article did you?
Thanks for your thoughts though. Thats reasonable.
Brady hasnt played any competitive ball in a year. He's gonna want to be on that field when PS starts for his normal # of reps, no more no less. Its all about game speed. Real game speed cant be duplicated. He had none entering game 1 last year.
To me, it's simple. Belichick will have Brady play in the preseason if he thinks Tommy needs to play in the preseason. Period. The rest is pure speculation because, if TB doesn't play in the preseason, we'll never know whether it's because BB thinks he's "good to go" or because there are still concerns about his knee. Yep, I can sure see the Presser where Coach tells the world he's keeping Brady out because his knee isn't ready yet. Yep. Sure thing there. igsfly:
The bottom line is that we'll only know if the "Old Tom Brady" is back when we see the "Old Tom Brady" playing on the field.
And, BTW, what's with all the "Tom effing Brady" stuff? I mean, once or twice is clever, but it got old fast.
I read the article and it doesn't offer anything but a fan's point or view. I don't need that, I need precedent for BB playing him after coming off an injury and last year was the precedent.
They didn't play him a down last preseason, I highly doubt they play him a down this preseason.
Of course it's just a fans point of view... The point was to open up discussion on the subject. YOU pointed out he didn't play at all last year in the preseason and that was the first line in the article I wrote, so it was easy for me to think you didn't even read it... whatever.
And I also said "I don't see him playing this preseason unless they feel it's best...at most one game and even then maybe a half."
I don't see him playing a down at all this preseason.
The "precedent" you set is irrelevant because you can not compare his ankle with his torn MCL and ACL... It's like comparing apples and oranges...
Really? Apples and Oranges? Two major mobility impairments on his legs aren't comparable?
NO THEY ARE NOT.... ONE kept him out for an entire season, and HE COULD NOT WALK ON IT! Not to mention, for the rest of his life, he will be susceptible to injuring it again...
The other one he could FRACKING PLAY ON!
And was 7 for 11 with 76 yards before he was injured...while in there he hardly seemed rusty nor out of step.