I don't know what a "game track" is.
I watched the game. The Bills moved the ball at will.
Therefore, one can assume, field position was largely irrelevant. I never said they would score touchdowns, only that they would move the ball.
The Bills punted ONCE in yesterday's game.
The assumption that we would have stopped them on the three drives the poster is flippantly throwing out due to field position or a special teams play is not a safe assumption.
The better assumption is that the Bills would have moved the ball with the ease in which they moved the ball all day.
Talk about zero situational awareness.
"Good" and "bad" are subjective terms that applicable within holistic analysis of a full data set.
I just lost a one on one game of basketball, you won. You are "good" and I am "bad". However, I lost 21-15 to Jordan in his prime. You beat a 95 year old, wheel chair bound senior citizen. You need to look at the whole data set.
Look at the stats for all the games yesterday. Denver put up 544 yards of offense. San Diego put up 523 yards of offense. They lost. 544 yards of offense isn't moving the ball "at will"?
Do I need to post the yardage numbers for all the teams?
Three teams "ran up and down" the field yesterday for 500+ yards....and lost.
Five teams had less than 300 yards total offense. Three won.
The "real" Steelers defense gave up 326 yards to an even more horrendous offense.
18 teams gave up more yards yesterday. Add tonight's game and that will be 20 teams.
Again
2010 NFL is about sustaining scoring. This was true in 2009. Look at the Super Bowl teams. Turnovers and redzone defense are more important than ever in evaluating today's defenses.
Are the Bills or Trent Edwards that bad?
30 teams played on Sunday, 18 team defenses did worse than ours.
This is not to say that our defense has issues. However, this thread seems to insist on being willfully ignorant in what is going on in the league in 2010.
In today's NFL, 400 yards of offense is no longer the exception, it's the norm.