Here's where I am with this. I don't think anyone is making the case that the secondary is being helped by the coaching. I think, and I've said before, that saying the guys the Pats have cut haven't gone on to excel elsewhere is a fair point. I don't think it's determinative (that it's all a talent issue) but it's a reasonable point to make.
But I am pretty confident at this point that a coaching change wouldn't hurt. (If this all comes from Belichick, then the secondary will be pretty much doomed until he leaves; that means he's picking these guys AND coaching them, so there's nowhere to go.)
A change would show accountability, which Belichick always preaches. If a player's not doing the job, then try to find someone who can. The same should apply to coaches.
And most importantly, a new coach MIGHT help. It's possible. (I hope). I really don't think it could hurt.
So outside of making Josh Boyer and his family feel bad for awhile, I just don't see the downside of making a change.
__________________