Welcome to PatsFans.com

The New England Patriots without Brady

Discussion in 'The Practice Squad' started by F0nSY, Dec 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. F0nSY

    F0nSY Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Can you imagine it ? Would we win 3 superbowls without Tom Brady? .


    Let's try imagine it.
  2. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Why would I want to? No and let's not.
  3. F0nSY

    F0nSY Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    You can do what you want...
  4. wyomingpatsfan

    wyomingpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2011
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Let's hope they won't look like the Colts w/o Manning.......
  5. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    8,962
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #70 Jersey

    Every time I see your avatar I think someone has hacked my account ...
  6. robertweathers

    robertweathers Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,628
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    They would still be great.

    It would be worse without BB.

    They would be in St Louis without Kraft.

    Patsfans.com wouldn't exist.
  7. wyomingpatsfan

    wyomingpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2011
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Hey....how'd you get my picture?:D

    Sorry about that...will go find another...unless you think the site can handle two Rico's!!!!

    ...I could be your younger twin bro???
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2011
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    8,962
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #70 Jersey

    Hah! I think at one point we had three posters here with Godzilla avatars so it wouldn't be unprecedented. Maybe you can use a different pic (like the one in your profile) so others know who's speaking; my posts are confusing enough!

    And, uh, welcome to the board!

    We now return to our regular thread ....
  9. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,133
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    I'd rather imagine getting my toes eaten by fire ants.
  10. alvinnf

    alvinnf Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well the one thing we have already seen is their commitment to being competitive. Unlike, the disgraceful way the Colts went about it. Even if someone wants to argue they played their hearts out, fine. Their contingency plan was non exhistant.......
  11. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +18 / 0 / -0

    #18 Jersey

    I don't have to imagine it. I saw it for many years.
  12. Joker

    Joker PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    Messages:
    16,128
    Likes Received:
    36
    Ratings:
    +56 / 2 / -2

    best.post.ever.
  13. Elijah

    Elijah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,168
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #11 Jersey

    idk maybe...
  14. MP-Logick

    MP-Logick Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Once upon a time, the world was created...

    And then a year later, it was 2002.
  15. Lifer

    Lifer Banned

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    They would not be even close to great without Brady. This year, without Brady, they would have been competing for Andrew Luck.
  16. Lifer

    Lifer Banned

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    I was talking to a football fan out here about Montana and Young and Favre and Rodgers and he actually said "You guys had that with Bledsoe and Brady" after I stopped laughing I explained to him about the tipped balls and Interceptions and throwing the ball out of bounds on the last play of the game and brooding when your team won the Super Bowl and crippling a girl at the Mosh Pit and etc etc etc. Yeah, there before Brady. And there was after Brady.
  17. Reckedtrek

    Reckedtrek Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    In about 4 years we'll be spending our time remembering how great it was to have him as our QB. But while we have him, the OP wants us to take time away from the success, and spend time thinking about what if we sucked?

    Yeah I'll get right to that. :eek:
  18. ay-yo

    ay-yo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Nope. Welker, Gronk, AH and Branch would still be one of the best receiving corps in the league, our OL would still be one of the best in the league and Hoyer would have this offense around league average. That, along with a D that creates a bunch of turnovers, will get you more than the 2 wins and therefore take you out of the luck sweepstakes.

    Would we be great? No. Would we be close to getting Luck? No.
  19. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,236
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Is it too late to "Suck for Luck"?
  20. robertweathers

    robertweathers Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,628
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    You don't think with that defense over from 01-07 that they would not find a QB to to take them to the playoffs consistently? They would not be a dynasty but they would be successful. As long as BB doesn't get canned after the 01 season I firmly believe that they would field competitive teams for years. Look at 2008.
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2011
  21. PatsFanInVa

    PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    19,530
    Likes Received:
    41
    Ratings:
    +43 / 0 / -2

    I love the dum dums on here saying we'd have exactly the same results as the Colts had this year, because hey look! They lost manning and they're 2-13! That means if we lost Brady we'd be 2-13!

    It just clarifies to me that they've been casual Pats fans at best, at least up to 2008.

    Dum dums: We lost Brady and Matt Cassel took us to 11-5. Now granted the football Gods had decreed we would just not make the playoffs that year, but do the math.

    Beside the fact that the Colts are just not that spirited or talented without laser-rocket-arm, there's the way he fits in their offense to think about.

    The Pats have a playbook and a system. I remember back in the day, when we talked Brady-Manning wars, they'd say Brady is a "system quarterback."

    They're right. So is Manning. Their "System" is a basic playbook, and TBH it wouldn't matter what's in it. Manning changes every play at the line of scrimmage. That's the system: One guy w/tremendous football vision and smarts changing the play on the fly to exploit weaknesses.

    A quick moment of appreciation for Seyton Manning, please? He's really, really, really good at that.

    Now Brady can audible, Brady can shift the pocket around, Brady can hit the open man, and Brady's a winner. It would be nice if he started doing more of that winning stuff in the playoffs for the last few years, mebbe 3 more rings, whatevah. But he doesn't do what Peyton does.

    That's a good thing, because if he did, this team would indeed be toast without him. You can't replace that with a random playbook du jour and expect similar results.

    I also think a lot of the Colts have thrown in the towel already. Some no, Freeny was still performing, but come on. 2-13? And probably 1-14, if it weren't that *cough* the Houston Texans are their Super Bowl...

    Anyway, if they throw/lose (hard to tell which it is this year) next week, best of Luck (pun intended) in the post-Manning era.

    Like the Colts brass says, you don't just replace Seyton... if he's back and all the way healthy, they'll have a shot. Otherwise, let the rebuilding begin. Window'll be closed a few years, sorry.

    Post-Brady Pats? With BB alive? Rebuilding might dump us down to 8-8 (I think.) We'll see. But I think 2008 was a very heartening preview. This team lucked out on a superstar pick. Yay us. But I think Brady's skills have overshadowed everything supporting him.

    After all, he's a (heh) "system quarterback."

    PFnV
  22. Fball

    Fball Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It's hard to compare '08 to this season. That was a really different team - with a much better defense, just for starters.

    The current team likely does not go 11-5 without Brady, or even close to it. I don't think they're 2-13 like the Colts, but they're probably .500.
  23. robertweathers

    robertweathers Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,628
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    5-11 or 6-10 is my guesstimate.
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2011
  24. TBradyOwnsYou

    TBradyOwnsYou Rookie

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  25. Joker

    Joker PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    Messages:
    16,128
    Likes Received:
    36
    Ratings:
    +56 / 2 / -2

    I love this board....it's like a Dali painting..

    OK, the Pats LOST Brady and they still went 11-5...that happened...as in that was REAL.

    every negative response in this thread and on the other one puts forth the exact same flawed assertion....the Pats COULD/WOULD go much worse if it was this year. You CANNOT make that judgement against what HAS occurred with what HAS NOT occurred.

    You have a body of work over a decade that shows a high rate of success every season, no matter what dire situations occur, but you all want to assert that IF it was THIS season, then, well, it'd definitely be all bad because...well...because you just KNOW it would be.That's fine, it's your OPINION, but it has zero to do with established fact.
  26. brdmaverick

    brdmaverick Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    ..but your conversation is better than the original thread

    After all, would the Chicago Bulls have won six championships without Michael Jordan. Let's try to imagine it.
  27. JMarr

    JMarr Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,317
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Exactly. We might have won 1 or 2 during those years. Defensive playmakers and an effective running game were crucial to those championships. It's no coincidence that once the Poilan rules began having their full effect the well went dry. Every year we've become more and more reliant on TFB to carry the team. Result: Patriots are now officially the Indianappolis Colts of the NFL, minus defensive studs like Mathis Freeney and Sanders.

    Plus, the '08 team could have gone all the way if Favre, Mangini and the Jets hadn't deliberately tanked their last game to keep us out of the playoffs, Rodney Harrison hadn't gotten hurt, or if we had had a decent RB to take pressure off a non-GOAT QB.
  28. RodThePat

    RodThePat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    2,240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    There is nothing dumber than using 2008 as a comparison to what the Colts have faced this season. The 2008 Patriots had the most talented roster in the league and a top-20 (at the very least) quarterback under center. This was the same squad that was a helmet catch away from being 19-0 one year earlier. Oh, and they had one of the easiest schedules in recent memory, facing both the NFC and AFC West in the very same season. That team lost to every single quality opponent it faced (Pittsburgh, Indy, Jets, Chargers and Dolphins). The 2008 Patriots were a serious threat to go undefeated again with Tom Brady under center, without him they were a little above average and ended up missing the playoffs.

    You are out of you goddamned mind if you think this 2011 edition of the Patriots without Tom Brady would be closer to 11-5 than 2-14. Really, it's just preposterous.
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2011
  29. LT56

    LT56 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I lol'd at the Sanders part.
  30. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    8,962
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #70 Jersey

    Oh, wonder if Rex has tried that.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page