Then why did you post 20 times that you believe they are a 'hybird'?
I referred to the Packers as a hybrid because it was not clear to me how to characterize them. "Publicly owned, nonprofit corporation" is certainly an oxymoron. Have you come up with any other examples? They may well exist, and it would be interesting to know what they are.
W could have solved this a long time ago if you accpeted my first post where I pointed out that your comment that they were neither non profit or for profit because they had owners...... was a misread on your part.
Your first post did not make any sense then, and it does not make any sense now. Most of your subsequent posts don't make any sense either.
At this point you seem to have accepted your incorrectness,
Well, no, since what I said was that the Packers do not fit either of the categories in the Wikipedia article. That is certainly true.
but choose to still blame it on Wikipedia not knowing how to write rather than you misunderstanding what you read.
The Wikipedia authors know how to write. You do not know how to read words in their context.
The Wikipedia article did not mention an extremely unusual case. This is to be expected in encyclopedia articles.