- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Of course I understand libel. You are the one who clearly doesn't understand it. Here are the definitions:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/libel
Unless you can prove that they make up rumors that they attribute to sources, you clearly fall into category 2.
This is my point. You clearly don't understand libel if you make that claim.
We finally agree on something. You, me, and Mike Florio and the rest of the PFT agree that there isn't a rumor that Harrison affected Samuel deal. The great thing is that none of us including Florio and PFT ever claimed there was a rumor.
Let's try this again........... slowly.......... for those....... such as yourself...... who can't wrap around....... a concept.
He made the claim on his RUMOR MILLS page.....
It's not a rumor...... It's blatant speculation ...... it has no source other than the poster himself.
Just because you can't come to grips with the fact that Florio seems to do a very good job of clarifying what is speculation on his part and what are rumors he has heard, doesn't mean you can libel the guy and accuse him of making up rumors that he attributes to unnamed sources. Florio is a lawyer by trade. I am sure he is pretty careful not to make up rumors and attribute them to others. He knows the legal troubles he can get in for that.
For you as well as the other gentleman.... read posts before commenting on them.