@Brotherblues your hypothesis was well thought out and based on facts. This one however is a poorly constructed hypothesis easily dismissed as lacking original thought or merit.
This is 100% conjecture and flies in the face of well documented reports. This part of the hypothesis is deemed to be false.
More unsubstantiated conjecture and deemed to be highly unlikely given the fact Caley has gone to interviews with two other teams. This part of the hypothesis is deemed to be false.
More unsubstantiated conjecture and deemed to be unlikely since had this happened, Caley would've been fired. This part of the hypothesis is also deemed to be false. So far batting .000
This is just nonsense. Caley's Wikipedia page is too short to have a nasty splotch mark. Plus if this was the case, why were other teams interviewing him?
I deem this hypothesis completely worthless, full of conjecture with no basis in reality.
Lol