There are numerous problems with you claiming your point is still the same. First and foremost, all the numbers show is that the draft is a crapshoot. It has no bearing on success.
Secondly, all you did was count players in the league from said drafted team. That's also not a sign of success.. Not when you consider that the entirety of the Jets 2012 draft class is playing for other teams or out of the league. Patriots have 2 of 7 from 2012 and the Bills have 2 of 9 from 2012. The Phins have 1 of 9 from 2012.
Next, you do not consider the fact that the average career is something like 5 years.. Would it surprise you to find out that 101 of the 144 picks by the Patriots occurred more than 5 years ago? So is it really a surprise that so many of the picks aren't in the league anymore? The Jets, Bills, and Phins have all made 39 picks in the last 5 years.
If you want to attempt to make some correlation regarding draft picks and success, you have to go beyond looking at the total numbers. You have to look at how many picks were made in each round. The fact that of the 144 draft picks the Patriots have had in the last 15 years, 53 of them have been in the 6th and 7th round. Compare that to the Jets who had 32 or the Bills that had 46 or the Phins that had 40.
You were shown to have completely false information about the Bills 132 picks instead of 124 and 44/45 players instead of 55. That makes the analogy totally irrelevant. And with the correct information it shows them to be .7% better than the Pats.. Yes. That is such a huge difference..
Fact is that you don't "make your point". You offered up 2 items, one of which proved to be false. And, the first one, you essentially penalized the Patriots for having selected Tom Brady and him being a success. You have then compounded the error by trying to throw more numbers out there and saying "See. See. I was right".. Unfortunately, that's just not the case.