- Joined
- Sep 22, 2004
- Messages
- 2,767
- Reaction score
- 641
Well, proof that, though some Pats fans may be intelligent, they also have some of the dumbest in the league.
The point really is that if Peyton's D had held SD to field goals instead of TD's, or if Brady's D had given up TD's instead of holding to FG's, Brady would have had a much worse choke today than Manning.
You're very right although very few on this board will acknowledge it. Brady has "choked" as much or more than Manning in the playoffs yet because he gets bailed out by his defense, he's incorrectly considered a "big game QB". I don't trust either QB very much in big games against good defenses but at least Manning has shown he can convert first downs and long passes against good defenses, unlike Brady.
You both have no clue that a "choke" is a situational name. Throwing a pick when up by 20 is, from your point of view, just as bad as throwing one when down by 7 on the final drive of the game.
But you are wrong. You can't say "if the Pats defense doesn't do the job Brady would have choked" because that situation never happened so we will never know. If called upon to come from behind to win the game, Brady has shown many times this season he is up to the task. With 9 minutes to go today with a 2 score lead the best way to win the game was to slow it down. Would they have done the same if behind? Of course not.
The FACT is this: even though last week the Indy defense had a bad week, when it came to crunch time Peyton could have won the game by making a play. And he didn't.