BritPat
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,596
- Reaction score
- 1,270
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The really awesome thing about regularly lining Welker up outside would be that you'd get to make the team worse at *two* positions.
even when they're going with 2 WR's?
ok
What if Branch gets cut?
Just sayin.
To believe Galloway is a lock, you probably need to think either:
1) He's outperformed Lewis.
2) A. The Pats really don't want to go less than 3 deep at "speed receiver", B. with none of Welker, Edelman, Aiken, Ventrone, Nunn -- or for that matter Watson -- qualifying for that role.
1) doesn't really seem to be the case. 2A), however, makes more sense.
So is 2B) a fair assessment? And how strongly is BB likely to feel about 2A)?
I'd luv it.......but,Meion is scheduled to get 5M in the last year of his contract and how likely is it he'll return to the pats with his tail dragging between his legs?
I think one can make the team despite not showing an ability to grasp the playbook. But I don't think one can be a veteran lock if one can't learn the plays ...I don't think its right to say 1 is a necessary.
How players perform in pre-season games is just part of the equation of who is a better keep on the roster.
Your implication is that all the players start equal and go out into preseason games to compete against each other for jobs.
I disagree with that idea.
How players perform in the exhibition games are just a part of the data. A guy like Galloway is a known commodity to some degree for what he has done over a career. If he is slow in adapting to our system and it shows in preseason games, it may be exactly what was expected.
A more talented player will make the team over one who had some good preseason game moments, and practice probably means more to veteran assessment than the practice games.