You judged the black players on the Dolphins and stated what is 'controversial in the black community'. I again asked for a basis for that.
Sorry for assuming this is common knowledge, since it's something the black people I know talk about regularly, it's been around for ages in discussion of Uncle Tom's, it's heavy in the culture too (ever see a Spike Lee movie, he only mentions it 10x per movie). I could go on and on, but this is the sort of controversy this issue always seems to raise:
Cornel West, Tavis Smiley playing poverty games | theGrio
You have no idea how Martin took the comment. You have no idea if Martin even attempted to bond with the black players. You are taking one comment FROM A REPORTER out of context, and then adding your insight to the black community to it.
What context could there possibly be for "he's not black enough?"
You seem to have an idea of how black someone is supposed to be and how other blacks are supposed to take that. You are way out of bounds here.
I said the exact opposite of this. I wrote that no one has the right to essentialize how Martin should act, and what constitutes blackness.
When the source of bigotry is race, it is exactly the same thing. You know that, you are backtracking to cover it up now.
1. I never accused the black players of racism. Look it up.
2. I don't think you're right that any bigotry is racial.
3. I used the word I've most commonly seen dealing with this issue, and it's commonly called "intra-race bigotry" which is different from racism. When black players say that Martin isn't black enough, they are not making declarations about the superiority of their race (or the inferiority of another). You may define racism differently, but I think this is a pretty common usage. When a person extols the superiority of one race over another, that's racism. I never said the black players were doing that in Martin's case, and that's why I never used the word racism to describe what they were doing, and it's why I called it bigotry.
Are you out of your mind? You are telling black people how they are supposed to act and feel.
I am saying they are people. Racism is putting everyone in a race under the same umbrella which is exactly what you are doing.
I am doing the opposite.
You compared 'the other blacks in the lockerroom' to 'an educated black man'. That is as offensive as Incognitos comment.
What? Where are you coming up with this?
1. I wrote that they SHOULDN'T declare that blackness is only one thing, that by saying Martin isn't black or black enough, they are putting all blacks into "one umbrella" as you put it. As for the last comment, you totally misconstrued what I was saying. That was only one possibility for why they don't feel Martin is black enough. I wrote that it could be his education. It could also be the fact that he's biracial. It could be that he doesn't apek like them. or like the things they do. It could be any number of things, but the fact that they singled him out as not being black enough tells me that they don't dislike him because he's a pansy, or because he sucks on the OL, or because he's a crybaby. They might dislike him for all the latter reasons, but when they say he isn't black enough, it's for an entirely different reason altogether. I was clear when I first wrote that that I was speculating. I have no idea really why they don't think he's not black. I'm only guessing that it has to do with one parent being white, or with his speech, or with his Stanford education. It could be other things.