In all 3 of our Super Bowl winning seasons we have sucked in week 1, we lost are first game in 2 of the 3 seasons.
2001 – Lost 23-17
2003 – Lost 31-0
2004 – Won 27-24
Belichick is the type of coach that like to try new things, mix it up, and he will keep trying something until he has seen that it will not work, and then he makes adjustments. He makes those better than any coach in the business, this loss will give him the insight he needs to make the adjustments, and we will move forward successfully as we did in are 3 SB seasons.
I am confident they will straighten out the OL and the defensive scheme. I also think players like Gronkowski, Easley, Vollmer, and Dobson are still works in progress; even Revis is just getting a feel for things. I still view us as strong contenders and I am glad that we highlighted our flaws early in the season so we can work them out now.
I agree with some of what you say, but "great news" is perhaps putting a bit too much spin on it.
One game does not a season make, so I agree with not over-reacting to one loss. As I see it, there were 3 levels of issues that showed up:
1. Possible conditioning and physicality issues. The Pats seemed to wilt in the 2nd half and self destructed, and were man-handled by the Dolphins. The heat and humidity may have played a role, including with the poor tackling, but it does make me question the teams conditioning, heart, and physicality.
2. Coaching and schematic issues. Rotating offensive linemen seemed like a recipe for disaster to me. Your OL needs consistency and needs to be in sync more than almost any other unit. Some of the offense's inability to protect and to move the ball in the 2nd half seemed related to that. On defense, using a 3-4 with Vellano and Jones as DEs just doesn't make sense; it seemed like the coaching staff was working for the other team in terms of neutralizing some of our potential playmakers and keeping some of the better players off of the field.
3. Personnel issues. The OL needs to be sorted out, and quick. There were significant mistakes and poor performances on all 3 squads today, some by players who had long ago been identified by many as potential problem points.
All of these problems are fixable, but they need major attention. It's discouraging to see a defense loaded with potential playmakers, only to play soft non-physical defense plagued with poor tackling and a lack of basic run defense. It's discouraging to see some of the offensive play selection and execution problems. In 2003 BB recognized a major weakness in run defense and addressed it; this year it seems like there is perhaps an OL need that requires more than just coaching or player maturation.
Having a big dose of humble pie served up at the beginning of the season isn't a bad thing, and I'd rather see this than have the team wilt down the stretch. But I think calling it a "great thing" may be going a bit too far.
The team was manhandled and got their asses whipped in all 3 phases of the games, and dominated in the 2nd half in a way that we've seldom seen before. Now we'll have to wait and see how they respond.