unoriginal
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,584
- Reaction score
- 756
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The unrestricted free agent list is crap once you get past Nate Clements and Asante Samuel:We draft 1-2 and sign a veteran FA, the position could be weakest on the team if he leaves.
I don't know much about Clement but he and Samuel are the top 2 FAs at CB. Samuel has gotten better every year, is young (26 for 07 season) and knows the system. I would prefer him but as a fallback Clement is very talented, much bigger, can play press coverage and is more physical in run support.
My point was that after these 2 the FA market for CBs is very thin and there appears to be a big drop in talent. My preference is to sign Samuel, if they don't I expect 1-2 CBs to get drafted maybe both on Day 1.
Yes too fragile. Only I believe 2006 was the only season in which he sat out for a couple of games due to injuries. Lay off him, he is not fragile! If you call Wilson fragile for being out for most of the 2006 season, then why dont you call Rodney fragile while your at it forbeing injured nearly all of 2005 and a good deal of 2006.wilson has proved fragile playiny safety he might be better suited at corner , nor nickel back
My big concern isn't Wilson at this point, but rather who will replace Harrison in the longer term. Wilson has the speed and covering instincts and showed himself to be an OK tackler earlier in his career. I'm worried about the future at SS, though. Like every other team, we need someone who can dominate physically and who can cover the TE or one of the backs. I'm not sure James Sanders is the answer, but then I haven't seen enough of him to judge (and I am certainly no expert).
I should also say that I am a Hobbs fan, as relevant as it is to this thread. I like his speed, his covering seems OK and I think he can really lay a hit on WRs.
Yes too fragile. Only I believe 2006 was the only season in which he sat out for a couple of games due to injuries. Lay off him, he is not fragile! If you call Wilson fragile for being out for most of the 2006 season, then why dont you call Rodney fragile while your at it forbeing injured nearly all of 2005 and a good deal of 2006.