- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 9,987
- Reaction score
- 7,880
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We found a solution to that, we now draft pre-injured 1st round RBs #boneonbone.Maroney *was* a top player but got injured and never properly came back. That's the risk with first-round running backs. If you remember him in 2006 -- especially as a KR -- he was the most aggressive runner you could imagine. All that stuff about "dancing" was later.
We found a solution to that, we now draft pre-injured 1st round RBs #boneonbone.
Correct. Easley is the poster child for this. Of course, what else are you going to do? BB is already great at getting "middle class" players. The draft is when he takes a few swings for the fences by taking risks at players with high upsides but some other flaw, typically medical. In the case of Easley he also was a head case.That's not just a joke.
I think BB has a policy of trying to "steal" players who would have gone earlier but for injury concerns, which is understandable when you are consistently drafting at the bottom of Round 1.
Unfortunately, the only ones I can think of where that worked are Gronk and (in the end) Cannon. On the other hand, there are Easley, Dowling, Brandon Tate, Stork and probably a few others I've forgotten. BB is a better scout than he is medical expert.
I watched a lot of the Big 10 then, Wisconsin Fan, and thought Crable was going to be a monster. He was an unbelievable talent with a nasty attitude especially against Wisconsin (multiple personal fouls) so I loved when they drafted him. I thought he was the next great outside LB for the Pats. Shows what I know. My scouting report on him was almost as bad as my feelings about TB12. "why waste a draft pick on this skinny kid from MI. We have Bledsoe and already have the qb of the future in Michael Bishop" What a dope Belichick is."No Shawn Crable peeps?
I'm hoping you HATE this year's draft ;-)I watched a lot of the Big 10 then, Wisconsin Fan, and thought Crable was going to be a monster. He was an unbelievable talent with a nasty attitude especially against Wisconsin (multiple personal fouls) so I loved when they drafted him. I thought he was the next great outside LB for the Pats. Shows what I know. My scouting report on him was almost as bad as my feelings about TB12. "why waste a draft pick on this skinny kid from MI. We have Bledsoe and already have the qb of the future in Michael Bishop" What a dope Belichick is."
Sadly I also loved the Easley pick.
Correct. Easley is the poster child for this. Of course, what else are you going to do? BB is already great at getting "middle class" players. The draft is when he takes a few swings for the fences by taking risks at players with high upsides but some other flaw, typically medical. In the case of Easley he also was a head case.
Yes, I think that's an important clarification, and I agree that we have no choice but take some gambles on injured players.Comparing a bone-on-bone situation to Easley who had shredded knees from the get go is not really fair. One of the two is an immediate issue the other one something for the second contract really.
And lets also not forget that taking chances on injured players is the only reason why we have Gronk.
Michel's injury history doesn't seem to be a problem to me. Half of the injuries were three plus years ago in high school and one was non-football related. Just put a clause in his contract that he has to stay off all terrain vehicles, even if Gronk challenges him to a race riding a dirt bike.Yes, I think that's an important clarification, and I agree that we have no choice but take some gambles on injured players.
FWIW, Sony Michel injury history and analysis gives Sony's injury history.
If I'm not mistaken, Cunningham was a better scheme fit for the defense we ran at the time.
He wasn't exactly a bust, but I thought Lawrence Maroney would be way better than he was.