- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Unless you think he could actually play linebacker...So with Hoch, Wendys, and Paxton
the LS position is oversubscribed.
Meaning the Pats don't need Zak
and this DeOssie orgy can peter out.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Unless you think he could actually play linebacker...So with Hoch, Wendys, and Paxton
the LS position is oversubscribed.
Meaning the Pats don't need Zak
and this DeOssie orgy can peter out.
Prior to last year he never drafted a RB in the first round either. I believe what you are saying, is that Bill.B is set in his ways and will not change. You know as much about Bill.B and what he will do as the rest of us here. Nothing.
My post was about the fact that no one on this board knows what Belichick is going to do. Did they know he would play Troy Brown on defense? Did they know that Richard Seymour would play offense? Did they know that Vrabel would be a threat in the endzone? Did they know that he would let Givens and Branch walk in the same year? Did they know that the Patriots would tag Samuel? Pretending they know what he will do is just that...pretending.
Not quite. He isn't going anywhere until someone comes along who can do the job better than he does, or who provides more value to the team.
No one is guaranteed a job just because they do it well. The idea that we can cut WMG and Ty Law, and let Branch, Vinatieri, etc etc walk, but we will never never let Lonnie go is ludicrous.
What about Lawyer Milloy? He was cut and a rookie (Wilson) took over. Wiggins was cut and a rookie took over. There are a zillion examples of vets who were cut or allowed to walk, and replaced with a rookie.
Huh? It is the same thing.
Tell me the difference between:
a) cut a vet and replace with a rookie
b) let a vet walk and replace with a rookie.