- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,681
- Reaction score
- 23,359
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Grouch.I'm seeing no link or any attribution to this "report" - - until there is , this thread title is being changed to a question. There's alot of discussion here about something that at this point is complete heresay.
If for any reason you are not completely satisfied, I hate you.
Worst Part of Decision
Had Moss left as a FA after the season, the Vikes would have gotten a 5th round compensatory pick. You can get a decent player in the 5th round.
I read this from a random poster, can anyone confirm whether or not this is true?
I read this from a random poster, can anyone confirm whether or not this is true?
Maybe they can get store credit. Nmandi would be a nice exchange
Based on the fact that Randy has 10+ years in the league, the highest pick Minn could have gotten is a comp 5th.I read this from a random poster, can anyone confirm whether or not this is true?
Weren't you the new guy thats a reformed vikings fan? Good descision
This is insulting to my intelligence... reminds me of the challenge on Tate's reception.
Do you really think there was no RISK involved with acquiring Randy Moss, a player who the Patriots traded due to his attitude problems?
Based on the fact that Randy has 10+ years in the league, the highest pick Minn could have gotten is a comp 5th.
That applies to guys that have less than 10 years in the league but Moss has 10+(Faneca rule).Unknowable. It all depends on the player's next contract & performance with the new team. (A fifth sounds high, though.)
Loking for another link but here's one: Faneca's Age, Obscure NFL Rule Cost Steelers on Comp Pick -- NFL FanHouseCould you please provide your link for this? I've not heard this ever. Nor have I seen the Comp Pick guru, AdamJT13, mention anything about this.