Welcome to PatsFans.com

By what week will O'Connell be starting?

Discussion in 'The Practice Squad' started by Wendel, Sep 29, 2008.

?

When will Kevin start?

Poll closed Oct 5, 2008.
  1. 5 (@ 49ers)

    2.5%
  2. 6 (@ Chargers)

    9.9%
  3. 7 (vs Broncos)

    12.3%
  4. 8 (vs Rams)

    14.8%
  5. 9 (@ Colts)

    2.5%
  6. 10-16

    3.7%
  7. He won't. We're 2-1 and Matt is our quarterback.

    54.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wendel

    Wendel On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Week 7, vs. Denver.
     
  2. DefenseRules

    DefenseRules Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    11,002
    Likes Received:
    243
    Ratings:
    +599 / 23 / -5

    #12 Jersey

    The only way O'Connell will see the field this season is in garbage time. The only way he will start is if Cassel is injured or completely INEFFECTIVE.
    BB is not going to start a Rooky QB, IMO.
     
  3. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,926
    Likes Received:
    286
    Ratings:
    +780 / 18 / -23

    #24 Jersey

    I voted for "He Won't". But if I were making the decision it would be in the next few weeks.
     
  4. PATSYLICIOUS

    PATSYLICIOUS Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,259
    Likes Received:
    68
    Ratings:
    +192 / 1 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    I predict Cassel finds his groove and stays the QB the whole season. There's gotta be a reason BB stuck with him after 4 worthless preseasons.
     
  5. Wendel

    Wendel On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The even better benefit of O'Connell excelling as compared to Cassel?

    We actually have the rights to him next year.
     
  6. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Oh gee another O'Connel/bashCassel thread!! Joy joy joy!! Oh happy dayyyy!
     
  7. BRiZ

    BRiZ Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    after he stinks it up versus the 49ers i would hope the Chargers game so we have a chance at beating them.
     
  8. SammyBlueCat

    SammyBlueCat Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    760
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +19 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Sounds a little bit presumptuous. Are you sure Cassel will stink it up? Are you sure O'Connell is ready to take on the Chargers?
     
  9. maryjane

    maryjane Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    You're going to get banned with talk like that.

    Cassel will be in the top 1/3 of passers by year end. IMO.

    If he's not there already.

    You'll see. Playoffs he'll be great.
     
  10. BRiZ

    BRiZ Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    :nooo:

    ^^^^^^^
     
  11. maryjane

    maryjane Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    He struggles some sure. But it's his 3rd game starting since high school. Everyone would struggle in that situation.
     
  12. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,947
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    We have the rights to him either way. If Cassel excels it will mean that the team is too and we could tag and trade Cassel.

    So essentially you lightweights are rooting against this team.
     
  13. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,947
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0


    Your a resident troll - rooting against this team because you want something to happen that will make you feel smart...
     
  14. Joker

    Joker PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    Messages:
    18,277
    Likes Received:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +3,502 / 25 / -35

    reminds me of the Michael Bishop cries from years ago...my philosophy as a Pats fan is simple...In BB I Trust
     
  15. Salva135

    Salva135 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    988
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +17 / 17 / -6

    I just don't see it happening... at least, not for any meaningful games this season. Cassel will have to be absolutely abysmal this season for O'Connell to get the start. The Vikings and Rams bench starters based on 1-2 games of poor performances, but the Patriots do not... they always have a vision, a plan, whatever -- and like it or not, Cassel is a part of it. The Pats simply do not do things that don't involve carefully calculated decisions, and benching a starting QB for a rookie isn't one of them. My guess is that if Cassel truly, truly demonstrates that he is a below-average NFL QB, by the time the organization is ready to come to grips with this, we will already be out of contention. If the Pats are eliminated from the playoffs with a couple of games to go, I can see O'Connell getting the starts to see what he can do. But if it counts, absolutely no way he's in.
     
  16. chris_in_sunnyvale

    chris_in_sunnyvale In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    In the "David Yudkin..." thread, there was talk about the Pats ramping up O'Connell's reps for an eventual takeover at QB. Yudkin is beating that drum again today and claims "insiders tell him" week 8 vs. St. Louis. I'll go along with his pick, but more for fun than anything. I don't know if he truly has inside info, but he's by far one of the best posters regarding the Pats at footballguys.com so I'll go along with him on this.

    Regards,
    Chris
     
  17. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,621
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    Week 16, Matt Cassel rests as the the team already has clinched homefield thru out the playoffs.
     
  18. everlong

    everlong Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    6,012
    Likes Received:
    127
    Ratings:
    +280 / 3 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    How did people pick SF for O'Connell starting? Do you really think he's going to be the surprise starter this coming week?

    I voted he won't but if he is going to start I think Denver or St. Louis are the most logical given they have the worst defenses we'll face in the upcoming weeks.
     
  19. chris_in_sunnyvale

    chris_in_sunnyvale In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    :cool:

    I like the cut of your jib. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    Regards,
    Chris
     
  20. GuyClinch

    GuyClinch On the Roster

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'd say week 7 but the of course the Pats will stick with him if they win. Can they win with a bad QB? If the Miami game is any indication - no. But the KC and Jets games indicate yes. But we will see..

    Another bad game and I expect full blown QB controversy.. I imagine BB is tired of the "he can't win without Brady" talk and would look to make changes at QB if the Pats start losing.

    Pete
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>