Listen, I've been a fan long enough, been to enough games and been around enough fans to know people either love Bledsoe or they hate him.
It's that simple.
A fan who's been around as long as you have knows it too, so don't pretend that you don't.
I have too much respect for you to think otherwise.
So what you are saying is your generalization of how you think people feel about Drew Bledsoe is more accurate than what I say my personal opinion of him is?
That is the most arrogant statement I've ever heard.
I was a tremendous Bledsoe fan, even somewhat of a Bledsoe apologist.
In retrospect I have seen why all those who argued with me that he was overrated, somehow missing that something that a winning QB needs, and flawed, were right.
I have fond memories of Bledsoe. He was a fun player to root for, even if he was equally frustrating. I am happy he was a Patriot. If I hate to choose between love and hate I couldn't but between like and dislike, I'd take like.
But none of that changes making an honest objective assessment.
My assessment about Bledsoe is not in the least impacted by whether I like him or not. It may come off as dislike because I am adamant about what I know to be true, but that is not a reflection of whether I like him or not.
Without going into excessive detail, I will give you some of my opinion of Bledsoe.
In his early years he carried the team to something a bit more than mediocrity. (Ironically i the playoff run that led to the SB berth, his contributions were the smallest, with the D and running game carrying the QB that carried them to the playoffs through the playoffs) I researched (Bledsoe apologist phase) that Bledsoe has done more with a terrible running game that any QB ever. It was something like---on teams with bottom 5 running games---Bledsoe led 4 to the playoffs and only 4 others had ever gone---he was the only QB to lead one to a SB, and maybe even to a playoff win. I'm rusty on the numbers, but they were impressive in that narrow definition.
However, that wass the Bledsoe of 1994-1998. Something happened that changed the player. That something was teams learning how to defend him. He was totally unable to adapt to that. Somehow he had a rebirth that first year in Buffalo, and I think that was because defenses were trying to figure out how to defend him WITH THOSE WEAPONS. But outside of that from 1998 on, he was at the very best an average QB, and by many measure a bad one who lost his job on 3 different teams.
If you are asking me if Tom Brady went down would I rather have Matt Cassell of 2008 or Bledsoe of 94-98 I would have no hesitation in saying Bledsoe. But that wasnt the question. The question was Cassel of 2004-2008 or Bledsoe of 2000-2001 and again I don't hesitate for a second to choose Cassell.
Perhaps the difference is you remember the young Bledsoe who was effective, and remembe what he became by 2000 which was not, by any means, a good QB.