PATS68
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 455
- Reaction score
- 85
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.However, a militant Marxist revolutionary is in the Oval Office and seems to have the communists rallying around him. FYI: this can attested to by Marxist revolutionaries/planners who knew him at Occidental College. And his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis was a card carrying member of the Communist Party USA (#47544). What do you understand about communism? Historically, communists who have been caught by the US Govt call accusers Red-bating lunes and declare themselves "progressives." Progressive utopia places an absolute faith in central planner..this is communism, folks. Once Henry Wallace's Progressive Party collapsed, the CPUSA infiltrated the Democratic Party; running members into elections for delegates.
So, although we might not be a communist nation, yet, plans are underway. Did Pope Francis really say that socialism causes misery, and that America is heading towards a form of communism? Did Pope Francis really say that socialism causes misery, and that America is heading towards a form of communism? – Telegraph Blogs …
Why do I keep reading through these posts "circumstantial evidence" when it is not circumstantial evidence. A body, recovered shell casings, GPS tracked phone, the staged gun at the crime scene, and video from his home is all direct evidence.
Defense already claiming this is a circumstantial case but that's some serious hope and prayers stuff. This is more then they had on OJ and short of prosecutorial missteps, the Juice would be in jail.
Innocent until proven guilty, sure, I understand that. But how anyone can come away from that laundry list and still think this is all just silly prosecutors focused on AH "because he's famous" is beyond me.
This is just what the prosecution showed now. I would not be surprised if one or both of the other 2 guys in the car have turned witness, especially when you note that neither have been named or in the spotlight (that I have seen).
This is a real shame, on so many levels.
Why do I keep reading through these posts "circumstantial evidence" when it is not circumstantial evidence. A body, recovered shell casings, GPS tracked phone, the staged gun at the crime scene, and video from his home is all direct evidence.
Why do I keep reading through these posts "circumstantial evidence" when it is not circumstantial evidence. A body, recovered shell casings, GPS tracked phone, the staged gun at the crime scene, and video from his home is all direct evidence.
If the part of him financially assisting his accomplices to leave town is true, why would he not leave himself?
Could the reason he looked defiant in court be, because he didn't commit the murder? If the accomplices killed Lloyd for him, it could be why he paid them to leave town. Why wouldn't he leave town? Maybe he thought with them out of the picture and himself not actually committing the crime, he could escape any trouble. Perhaps, he's wrong.
The Patriots had to have been aware of the evidence that was growing against him, why not release him last week?
I know I've been one of the one's calling him guilty, and he probably is, but there's something missing from all this and I can't put my finger on it.
If the part of him financially assisting his accomplices to leave town is true, why would he not leave himself?
Could the reason he looked defiant in court be, because he didn't commit the murder? If the accomplices killed Lloyd for him, it could be why he paid them to leave town. Why wouldn't he leave town? Maybe he thought with them out of the picture and himself not actually committing the crime, he could escape any trouble. Perhaps, he's wrong.
The Patriots had to have been aware of the evidence that was growing against him, why not release him last week?
I know I've been one of the one's calling him guilty, and he probably is, but there's something missing from all this and I can't put my finger on it.
If the part of him financially assisting his accomplices to leave town is true, why would he not leave himself?
Could the reason he looked defiant in court be, because he didn't commit the murder? If the accomplices killed Lloyd for him, it could be why he paid them to leave town. Why wouldn't he leave town? Maybe he thought with them out of the picture and himself not actually committing the crime, he could escape any trouble. Perhaps, he's wrong.
The Patriots had to have been aware of the evidence that was growing against him, why not release him last week?
I know I've been one of the one's calling him guilty, and he probably is, but there's something missing from all this and I can't put my finger on it.
Why do I keep reading through these posts "circumstantial evidence" when it is not circumstantial evidence. A body, recovered shell casings, GPS tracked phone, the staged gun at the crime scene, and video from his home is all direct evidence.
Daughter, multi-million dollar contract, being considered one of the best at your position, fame, set for pretty much life
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Deciding to kill someone for freaking talking to people you have problems with, spending the rest of your life in prison.