Snake Eyes
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,699
- Reaction score
- 455
Thank goodness none of you are insane.
Ummm yeah, even by the BATF's admission 99% of gunowners aren't a problem.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Thank goodness none of you are insane.
For my own safety, I'd like anyone who owns a fully automatic AR-15 to be one someone's list. There is no reason to have one except to intimidate or kill. Its over kill for protection, its immoral as a hunting gun.
The NRA likes to use the "slippery slope" argument all the time when fighting even the most reasonable gun control laws. I would opine that we've gone down the "slippery slope" in the other direction over the last few decades. We live in a country where "weapons of mass murder" are as readily available to ANYONE who wants them for any purpose, either legally or illegally.
Yet the NRA and their ilk fight ANY attempt at regaining some sort of logic back into gun control. Laws that would allow law abiding sane people to own guns, while protecting the rest of us from people who not have the ability to kill, but to kill on a massive scale.
So excited to see where this conversation on gun control takes us.
So excited to see where this conversation on gun control takes us.
You’re making some tremendous assumptions there.
I own a BUNCH of these guns and 1) I’ve never killed anyone, and 2) I haven’t made a single one full-auto. That’s true for every single gun-owner I know.
For my own safety, I'd like anyone who owns a fully automatic AR-15 to be one someone's list. There is no reason to have one except to intimidate or kill. Its over kill for protection, its immoral as a hunting gun.
The NRA likes to use the "slippery slope" argument all the time when fighting even the most reasonable gun control laws. I would opine that we've gone down the "slippery slope" in the other direction over the last few decades. We live in a country where "weapons of mass murder" are as readily available to ANYONE who wants them for any purpose, either legally or illegally.
Yet the NRA and their ilk fight ANY attempt at regaining some sort of logic back into gun control. Laws that would allow law abiding sane people to own guns, while protecting the rest of us from people who not have the ability to kill, but to kill on a massive scale.
I really want to hear from the guy here in this forum who calls himself "I've killed people" about his stance on gun control
England firearms homicides per 100k population 0.07, US 2.97. I'd guess our inability to stroll into the local supermarket and buy a semi auto assault rifle with our tea helps keep firearm murders low but can't be certainI hear England...they want you back.
SAN FRANCISCO—With the 49ers outside linebacker entering rehab earlier this week, multiple sources expressed concerns Friday that Aldon Smith’s indefinite leave of absence would absolutely cripple San Francisco’s bar scene.
“You just can’t replace a guy like Aldon,” said Mission District bar owner Hank Reynolds, adding that Smith’s dominant presence during two-for-one rails and taps night would be greatly missed. “You can hope that somebody steps up to fill the void, but our business just isn’t as shored up with an All-Pro drinker like that out of the mix.”
England firearms homicides per 100k population 0.07, US 2.97. I'd guess our inability to stroll into the local supermarket and buy a semi auto assault rifle with our tea helps keep firearm murders low but can't be certain