How do you justify giving an outside player, who will be a gamble, as much if not more--than the important players who we need to sign and appreciate now?
While I do mostly agree with you, Colvin was pretty much exactly that sort of gamble.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How do you justify giving an outside player, who will be a gamble, as much if not more--than the important players who we need to sign and appreciate now?
At this point, all I can ASSUME is that you like to argue.
I was merely stating (try this one more time) that your assumption is that he will go from wanting to be one of the higher paid players in the league to taking HALF the money. My assumption is that he would be bringing more to the table by proving his value in versatility through being able to play up on the line, and also switching to OLB. Like I said, it would have to be close to the Suggs situation, and probably then he would still want a little more money.
How does a player take LESS money by proving that he could be used in many different formations, thus making him MORE versatile
He hasn't proved that he is more versatile. .
Yes, I agree with everything you just said. What the problem is however, is what it would do to the players who have given their 'all' or best on our team over the past few yrs. How do you justify giving an outside player, who will be a gamble, as much if not more--than the important players who we need to sign and appreciate now? If next yrs salary cap does not have a ceiling then maybe we could do all of this then. I have my doubts as to how we could pull off a higher priced contract, (you and I are arguing over how much that contract would be, but the fact is it would be higher priced) and still take care of our own--without changing the face of the team. After all, we have excelled as a team, not giving in to one-player deals
Not so much, but it is hard not read your comments as argumentive and antagonistic, when you capitalize entire words and go out of your way to repeat them and embelish them.
No, it was your assumption that I believed he would take half the money. That 17 million is most likely not going to be paid to him and even if it is, it doesn't prove worth.
No other team is going to give him 17 million. Haynesworth contract is essentially 4 years at 48 million. If 11 - 12 million per year is his value as a DE then what is his value as a LB?
He hasn't proved that he is more versatile. When has he played OLB or with his hand off the ground?
Potential is worth a warm bucket of spit.
So my point is:
1. He is not worth 17 million a year
2. He would never see 17 million a year from any team other than Carolina - and even that is unlikely
3. 8 million would be about 75% of his worth as a DE
4. 10 million or more would be a lot of money for a LB and would make him the 2nd highest paid LB in the league
5. If he wants to make more than Freeney/Allen etc.. then he needs to stay in the 4-3 or at least pretend to be indifferent.
Alright I think we are getting crossed up here between the seperate posts. I have no idea how it would impact the locker room, in all honesty it shouldn't, but you never know. The players mindset as a bunch is foolish. But many folks wondered what AD's contract would do and it didn't seem to affect things. Vrable recently said that the mentality in NE is that each player needs to deal with their personal situation and once they sign and are "happy" they need to show up and play football.
Exactly. He is going to a position where he HAS TO BE more versatile. Hes proven hes an elite 4-3 end. He hasn't proved anything as a 3-4 OLB.
I agree with bonzoburns. Peppers weakness is in the run, which is Seymours strength. he is too big to fit in at OLB, which I believe, would expose his weakness even more. I just don't see a good fit. In a choice between Peppers and Jason Taylor, I think Taylor would fit in better as a situational OLB.
Yes but in AD's year, we didn't have the contractual needs of signing a Wilfork or a Seymour. We also had just extended Sey, and shored up the O line. We were not in the same situation.
While I do mostly agree with you, Colvin was pretty much exactly that sort of gamble.
Good point. I honestly think it will be tough to resign Seymour unless BB is ready to break the bank. And obviously that would be tough if we signed Wilfork and Peppers. Next offseason is going to be extremely interesting.
Not sure if I want to see Peppers on the Pats but I do believe he can be had for less than people think.
I don't get the "he is to big" thinking. Yes, most people his size couldn't play OLB because they are to slow. But Peppers is anything but slow, he runs a high 4.6 which is in the range of the top end running backs coming out of college this year.
A 4-3 end is rarely going to be looked at as a run stopper. That is the OLB and DT responsibility (for the most part) in a 4-3. More often than not the end is stunting or picking a side with the priority of getting to the QB, which leaves him vulnerable to cutbacks/adjustments by the RB. Freeney and Allen are prime examples of this.
The only edge that Taylor has is that he made the transition and did it well. Peppers is listed as an inch taller and 30 LBS heavier than Taylor. Yet, Peppers is faster and 5 years younger.
Peppers runs a 4.68 but straight line speed is not the issue at hand. At 290 lbs, his issue is agility and change of direction. Do you think he will be able to make an open field tackle? By the way, most top end running backs run around a 4.5 or less.
Peppers runs a 4.68 but straight line speed is not the issue at hand. At 290 lbs, his issue is agility and change of direction. Do you think he will be able to make an open field tackle? By the way, most top end running backs run around a 4.5 or less.
Someone should really let BB know this information. Hopefully its not to late.