Brady6
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 15,641
- Reaction score
- 5,580
No but I think about you getting all angry and it just gets me going...Do you think about ripping on DA and KA when you play with yourself?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No but I think about you getting all angry and it just gets me going...Do you think about ripping on DA and KA when you play with yourself?
First lets get something clear. What do YOU THINK I am "willing" to pay DA?So why are you willing to pay Amendola for what he did to help win the Super Bowl?
Huh? Says the guy who has to bring up KA and DA in every thread and make up crap when he knows he is spewing ********No but I think about you getting all angry and it just gets me going...
No but I think about you getting all angry and it just gets me going...
And I really disagree when it comes to Arrington. I think he's a better slot corner right now than Wilfork is a DT/NT.Were you watching the same Amendola and Arrington I was the last 2 seasons? Same theory applies to them. You are stuck on a number (age) but real factor is talent level. If you ask me Wilfork is still far more talented at his position at his age than Amendola or Arrington are at their position(s) at their age(s).
I watched him play. I focused on him a lot. I didn't think he was that good. He couldn't push the pocket on passes like he has before. He really struggled with that. He struggled with getting separation from his OL, often resulting in being a split second to late in getting to the runner, which meant that the runner could either slip out of the tackle or drag Vince for a few yards. He really didn't look close to his old self. He wasnt the force on the DL that he has been before.Wilfork played last season on an incentive based contract and earned every incentive, that is the epitome of earning your pay. He also managed to be on the field over 75% of the defensive snaps despite the fact that they spent the majority of their time in sub packages, which means he was also the most versatile DT on their roster. I can understand people wanting Wilfork to restructure to help the team but anyone claiming he didn't have a good season is just making things up and didn't actually pay attention to his play. It's a popular meme but it isn't true.
I watched him play. I focused on him a lot. I didn't think he was that good. He couldn't push the pocket on passes like he has before. He really struggled with that. He struggled with getting separation from his OL, often resulting in being a split second to late in getting to the runner, which meant that the runner could either slip out of the tackle or drag Vince for a few yards. He really didn't look close to his old self. He wasnt the force on the DL that he has been before.
My bad, I thought this was a thread about Wilfork, I should have realized that every thread is about Amendola.
Nah I just firmly believe stupid questions deserve stupid answers...So not only are you deliberately trying to piss another poster off but you are doing it in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with your Danny Amendola agenda.
If you want to grind your axe start a thread about it, don't turn every other thread into your soapbox.
Re-watched the Ravens & Colts games with some focus on Wilfy.
He's not the player he was nor should we expect him to be. He did command a double team a few times but my concern was how several times young OGs would take him out of the play completely. Maybe he'll be better in 2015 with another year healed but I believe that age for a BIG guy will be more of a negative factor. I don't see him being worth anything close to $8.5 million in 2015 and will be surprised if he gets paid his bonus. Hate to see this as he's one of my favs, but cap$ and laundry rules.
Nah I just firmly believe stupid questions deserve stupid answers...
On pass rushes he often got held up by one guy. The OL was able to single team him much more then what was possible in 2012 and before, both on run and pass. That was a death sentence to offenses a few years ago, but not today.I don't think he was as explosive as he was when he was 28 but I think we have to understand what was being asked of him and more often than not that was to tie up two OL not to get after the passer. He also played pretty much every position on the line and was key for them when they went to two man DL. And I really don't understand how anyone can say he didn't earn his pay when it was incentive based and he met every incentive, that's the definition of earning your pay. Again, I can understand people wanting him to restructure but I definitely take issue with those claiming he didn't earn his pay and didn't play well when he clearly did both.
Well I'm talking about Amendola and Arrington because they have rather large cap hits and I feel we would be fine without either of them.And I really disagree when it comes to Arrington. I think he's a better slot corner right now than Wilfork is a DT/NT.
You where the one who even brought up the age numbers. You are the one that's stuck to them. You are also the one who's so obsessed about hating Amendola that you bring him up in every reply to me, even when I only talk about Arrington.
Why are you talking to me?In which case you are definitely the person to go to.
Arrington doesn't have a large cap hit. I think his cap is reasonable for a starting player of his caliber on the defense. His skills are what allows us to gameplan away speedy slot receivers.Well I'm talking about Amendola and Arrington because they have rather large cap hits and I feel we would be fine without either of them.
That whole you hate Amendola things is so ****ing old at this point, you and some of the others ignore any logic and just lob out that BS accusation to add merit to your nonsense. Grow up, nobody hates Amendola I have said several times he performed well in the playoffs and I would welcome him back but not at the expense of Wilfork or one of our other top players.
On pass rushes he often got held up by one guy. The OL was able to single team him much more then what was possible in 2012 and before, both on run and pass. That was a death sentence to offenses a few years ago, but not today.
I think that he earned his pay for 2014. He played enough snaps to earn all his incentives. He allowed us to play a versitile D by playing all over the line and he made some really nice plays. But that doesn't mean he has earned a single cent for 2015, or should get payed payed for 2015 to give him even more for his 2014 services as one guy I responded to said. If he was a free agent, not named Wilfork, then I don't think anyone would pay even close to the $8M he's getting this year for the level of play he displayed last year. Because that's above average DT pay, and he wasn't an above average DT last year.
Why are you talking to me?