- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,693
- Reaction score
- 24,295
I am in complete agreement Edelman trending at 109 receptions, 1096 yards and 5 touchdowns, all of which would be better than Amendola has ever had in a single NFL season. Edelman is bigger, stronger, faster and more agile than Amendola, to me I would rather have the guy who wasn’t even a wide receiver entering the NFL and has improved each year since entering the NFL, especially if that player could be had at a lower cost.
Edelman - 5'10 3/8 inches - 198 lbs - 4.52 (40), 3.92 (shuttle), 6.62 (3cone), 13 reps at 225
Amendola - 5'10 4/8 inches - 195 lbs - 4.68 (40), 4.25 (shuttle), 6.81 (3cone), 14 reps at 225
Welker - 5'8 6/8" - 195 lbs - 4.65(40), 4.01 (shuttle), 7.09 (3cone)
So, Edelman isn't bigger. Their benchpress are identical and you have no proof that one is actually stronger than the other on the field. What is your proof that Edelman is more agile other than the numbers from the combine. Which, btw, Welker showed to be quicker on the field than either Amendola or Edelman, yet their numbers were better than his.