The Media BS and More BS...

[Joker]

Sorry Lifer...I must have you confused with someone else from Kansas

 

[PatsFaninAZ]

You need to update your post, it is factually incorrect.

"As simply as it can be put, the police believe, and a judge agreed, that based on known facts, evidence pertaining to the homicide might be found in Aaron Hernandez's house."

No. "might" is not PC. It must be enough that a reasonable and prudent person believes it is probably true -- that is, more probable than not. Hence the word "probable."

 

[zoostation]

At the very least AH should stay home and forget about seedy strip clubs for a while....at the very least.

Are you still trying to connect the dots between a murderer and a strip joint patron? The relevance of your statements (same statement in the witch hunt post) is extremely confusing

 

[The Boston Patriot]

No. "might" is not PC. It must be enough that a reasonable and prudent person believes it is probably true -- that is, more probable than not. Hence the word "probable."

Well clearly they have been unsuccessful so far as evidenced by the lack of an arrest. Probable means likely but not certain to be or become true or real, somewhat like "might". Good grief!

 

[PatsFaninAZ]

Well clearly they have been unsuccessful so far as evidenced by the lack of an arrest. Probable means likely but not certain to be or become true or real, somewhat like "might". Good grief!

No, they are not close. Police cannot enter a citizen's home and seize his things because he "might" have contraband or evidence of a crime. Not close. I might have a hot dog at the game and I probably will have a hot dog at the game are different things entirely, and the fourth amenment and 240 years of constitutional criminal procedure turn on the difference.

As for "good grief" I don't have a problem with you giving your speculation or opinion about what all this means, just as I am doing. None of us knows and no opinion is superior to any other. But if you are going to qoute my post, tell me I am wrong on a subject I know like the back of my hand, and go so far as to tell me I am obligated to edit my post, I don't think it is out of line for me to defend my post by noting yours is mistaken.

 

[Joker]

 

[Gwedd]

Cheese it! It's Creosote!

Them what knows, knows.......

 

[The Boston Patriot]

No, they are not close. Police cannot enter a citizen's home and seize his things because he "might" have contraband or evidence of a crime. Not close. I might have a hot dog at the game and I probably will have a hot dog at the game are different things entirely, and the fourth amenment and 240 years of constitutional criminal procedure turn on the difference.

As for "good grief" I don't have a problem with you giving your speculation or opinion about what all this means, just as I am doing. None of us knows and no opinion is superior to any other. But if you are going to qoute my post, tell me I am wrong on a subject I know like the back of my hand, and go so far as to tell me I am obligated to edit my post, I don't think it is out of line for me to defend my post by noting yours is mistaken.

I don't have a problem with your expertise (I don't know what it is but I will cave to your profound knowledge on the topic) but it seems to me (as a pedestrian and common man) you are picking fly**** out of pepper. Some say tomato, etc., etc.

 

[Bruins29]

(as a pedestrian and common man).

Are you walking someplace?

 

[PatsFaninAZ]

I don't have a problem with your expertise (I don't know what it is but I will cave to your profound knowledge on the topic) but it seems to me (as a pedestrian and common man) you are picking fly**** out of pepper. Some say tomato, etc., etc.

Many would say you have described my job perfectly.

 

[Joker]

Try insect sized Bounty!!!...the quicker fly***** picker upper...

 

[PATS16N0]

I wish a mod or someone active enough would start a thread and update the OP with facts for a quick find reference. I understand chatting about what's going on, of course, but sifting through 2,000 pages of replies and back and forth to find one sentence of actual truth is getting sort of rough.

Would be nice if developments could be compiled into the first post as they happen so people with limited time can come get their quick fix and update.

Any takers?

Thanks in advance if so!

 

[Joker]

OK...I'll try to help...here's the latest update as of 1:06 am EST...


.



.




.




.





.






.





.






.






.




uh...that's about it

 

[Gwedd]

I don't have a problem with your expertise (I don't know what it is but I will cave to your profound knowledge on the topic) but it seems to me (as a pedestrian and common man) you are picking fly**** out of pepper. Some say tomato, etc., etc.

FWIW, "picking the fly specks out of the pepper" is exactly what my (and others in my rate) job was described as.

 

[vyrago]

The "media problems" we see these days are mostly Internet-driven. Twitter is the primary culprit. It's all so competitive and greater risks are being taken to be first with the news vs. making responsible accuracy priority one.

See marathon bombing, a reporting mess if there ever was one.

 

[AzPatsFan]

You are so full of crap. He destroyed the home surveillence system, he smashed the cell phone, and had the place scrubbed hours after the death. The body was found in his rental, hours after they were together.
Does this describe your average day? Look i know hes a good tight end on our favorite football team, doesnt mean we have to live in fricken denial

Pound Sand, Idiot.

 

[ravensgamer]

So I am probably a murderer, by the criterion used by the Media.

You're a cereal killer; they have video of you with those Cheerios.

 

[crew1954]

No, they are not close. Police cannot enter a citizen's home and seize his things because he "might" have contraband or evidence of a crime. Not close. I might have a hot dog at the game and I probably will have a hot dog at the game are different things entirely, and the fourth amenment and 240 years of constitutional criminal procedure turn on the difference.

As for "good grief" I don't have a problem with you giving your speculation or opinion about what all this means, just as I am doing. None of us knows and no opinion is superior to any other. But if you are going to qoute my post, tell me I am wrong on a subject I know like the back of my hand, and go so far as to tell me I am obligated to edit my post, I don't think it is out of line for me to defend my post by noting yours is mistaken.

I think Barry Hussein's **** holder, Eric has already let that horse outta the barn, along with the 1st,2nd and 14th.

 

[Deus Irae]

I think Barry Hussein's **** holder, Eric has already let that horse outta the barn, along with the 1st,2nd and 14th.

There's no real sense in getting political about the undermining of the Bill of Rights. Both parties seem to love doing it, and it's usually the right carving back the 4th and 5th (the left particularly enjoys carving back the 1st and 2nd, while both sides completely ignore the 9th and 10th).

 

[The Boston Patriot]

I think Barry Hussein's **** holder, Eric has already let that horse outta the barn, along with the 1st,2nd and 14th.

Too bad I can't give you more than one like on this post!