SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why Mallet and not Tim Tebow, Jon Beck or David Garrard?
What has Mallet shown them that others haven't? Their whole system is based on timing patterns, quick releases and audibles at the line of scrimmage. Mallet is a Drew Bledsoe big arm guy. Hoyer would be far better for that system.
Why would the Colts want to give up their potentially high 1st rounder to a team Polian so obviously hates?
Honestly, the blind fantasizing in here tonight is incredible.
Tebow was a first round draft choice who gained some experience last year.
Mallett was a 3rd round draft choice who hasnt taken an NFL real snap.
How is Tebow ruled out as a QB of the future but Mallett qualifies?
I understand you think Tebow sucks but he was more highly regarded when he was drafted than Mallett was.
Perhaps that will bring some persepctive to this thread.
NFL GMs felt Tebow was a more valuable draft choice than Mallett.
Anyone think the Colts are offering a 1 for Tebow?
I have zero problem with a rumor that they have asked about Mallet or that there could be a trade for him.
There have been folks here stating they think it could be a 1st rounder. That's where I have to laugh. There are too many reasons for the Colts not to even entertain the thought of giving up a 1st rounder to Belichick for Mallet. In the 1% chance that they would, Belichick would fall out of his chair rushing to make the trade official.
Wow! I can't believe people don't see Mallet is a potential starter in the league and Hoyer is mediocre backup at best. That was evident to me pregame 1.
Yes Mallett has a ways to go but his cieling is much higher.
I say win now. if we can get a solid position player were we are weak, go for it.
Mallett is a few years away.
Stop this nonsense
They have Collins, and Garrard is available should they want another QB
... :beersign: ... this forum ... 168 posts based on a Tweet ... a simple TWEET ... .
And an ensuing argument where one person clearly states it's a hypothetical situation. Go figure huh.... :beersign: ... this forum ... 168 posts based on a Tweet ... a simple TWEET ... .
If you could get a 2012 #1 for Mallett now before a. investing more time and effort in teaching him this system and b. finding out he potentially isn't a fit you'd be silly not to. A 2012 #1 for Mallett that will likely be in the top 10 would be worth exponentially more than a #1 and a #1 say in 2013...if you could even anticipate him projecting to create (as Brady's backup) the kind of buzz he'd have to be generating by then to warrant that kind of potential value.
For Indy to invest a 2012 first or second round pick in a QB he will have to project as someone who could theoretically replace Manning. Hoyer doesn't project as that. Mallett potentially could. And that's not even a knock on Hoyer, it simply is what it is. Hoyer projects as a potential replacement for someone who never panned out on a team otherwise build to win if they just had a competent guy at the position.
The reason this thread is so popular is because the concept is tantalizing, and the stakes are significant. This trade is unlikely to go down, but it does reflect a few points of reality that resonate (1) that the Colts have need for depth and youth at QB, (2) BB has invested a luxury pick on a young player with a high ceiling, without an imminent need, (3) BB believes in grooming QBs that he can monetize into trade value.
I don't believe that BB intends that Mallett will ever play QB for him, barring a catastrophe to Brady. The timing is off, and unless Tom is unreasonable in his contract demands, they have a marriage made in heaven. Mallett is a project, like Cassell, for the future.
The season for the Colts isn't going to be any different whether they trade for Mallett or not. They are committed to Collins and Manning, however that works out. But that balloon payment on Manning's contract is looking pretty serious, and they must be wondering what they going to do about 2013. Getting a kid into the system now has value for the Colts franchise that it didn't just a few weeks ago.
Not sure if they'd be willing to offer a 1st. It is possible, if they feel really trapped. Next year's draft class may not be as deep at QB as it was this year. Mallett might have been a top-30 selection next year...and the value of a year in the system...that's not nothing.
Indy was very public prior to the draft about the idea of drafting a young QB to be groomed, but it didn't shake out. And for the record, the Colts 3rd round pick was #87. Mallet went #74. In the second round, they took an OT, a major need, not a hypothetical need. I'm sure they have regrets about the draft, and wish they had been more aggressive, assuming they liked Mallett.
I think they might reasonably offer a 2nd rounder for Mallett, which is even value for what the Pats spent in the draft, based on the idea that a year delay is worth about one round of value. And BB might say yes, if they kick in as little as a 4th. If they up it to a 2012 2nd + 2013 2nd, that's starting to smell better.
It's a bit of a wild notion, but not as implausible as this thread has made it seem. Mallett has been one of the most highly regarded college QBs for many years, and the kind of young player a team would invest in.
It's a bit of a wild notion, but not as implausible as this thread has made it seem. Mallett has been one of the most highly regarded college QBs for many years, and the kind of young player a team would invest in.
I'm of the opinion that teams felt he had a 10 million dollar a year plus arm, but a 10 cent head. And that is why he fell to us in the third. Not sure how many teams regarded him highly, especially after looking at his decision making on tape.
Clearly Luck should be the QB the Colts focus on for the 2012 draft.
Exactly.
However, it seems Mallett partied a bit at a rookie symposium right before training camp, and that reminder of character concerns probably knocks his trade value down below the level we'd be excited about.
There's a million reasons why this would never happen but I'll pick one, pride. If he were to do this Polian would basically be admitting that he screwed up so badly by not having a plan b that he had to trade a first to his own personal devil to make up for it.
If it were true I'd pay for pay per view to hear the conversations between the Bill's to get this done. NFL Network could pimp that harder than the upcoming special on BB.
Precisley.
The folks chirping about this possibility are blind to whom the people involved in such a trade are.
Folks, please google "Bill Polian" and "Patriots". You're talking a neurotic megalomaniac who is the source of the Kravitz' May column. Everything he does he comments on how the Patriots would do it worse. He's obsessed.