- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 32,634
- Reaction score
- 23,169
First of all, that was me talking about the potential of the RB's--and FWIW, both have played. However, you took my post completely out of context, as it was in response to you "not liking the Pats recent draft." I was simply speaking of the recent draft, and the fact that you claimed "that the Pats liked Woodhead so much they went out and got 2 rookies in the draft." I explained that the entire reason why they got 2 RB's was due to the age and injury prone-ness of guys like Fred Taylor, Sammy Morris, and Faulk--who missed the entire yr and is currently scheduled to miss approx. almost 1/2 of this yr. They needed youth at the RB position, and added speed and overall depth. But it was certainly NOT b/c they did not value Woodhead as you were implying.
Besides that, I quickly said that you had a viable point in regards to not being able to bring up 2 rookie RB's who have not done anything in real-game action, so in essence I agree with you. However, Spacecrime has a very good point in stating that you must follow the same logic. If you can be excited by a guy who really hasn't even shown anything in the pre-season and was not exactly rated very highly in regards to the position, then I can certainly get excited about a guy who averaged 6 yds a carry, can pickup the blitz, gain the short-yd, and also catch the ball out of the backfield. Not to mention that Vereen was rated as one of the top 4-5 RB's coming into the draft. But again, that whole conversation is taken out of context. In the big picture, it was probably wrong of me to bring the potential of the RB's up, and I wouldn't if it hadn't been in response to your drafting question.
Besides that, I quickly said that you had a viable point in regards to not being able to bring up 2 rookie RB's who have not done anything in real-game action, so in essence I agree with you. However, Spacecrime has a very good point in stating that you must follow the same logic. If you can be excited by a guy who really hasn't even shown anything in the pre-season and was not exactly rated very highly in regards to the position, then I can certainly get excited about a guy who averaged 6 yds a carry, can pickup the blitz, gain the short-yd, and also catch the ball out of the backfield. Not to mention that Vereen was rated as one of the top 4-5 RB's coming into the draft. But again, that whole conversation is taken out of context. In the big picture, it was probably wrong of me to bring the potential of the RB's up, and I wouldn't if it hadn't been in response to your drafting question.