JoeSixPat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,671
- Reaction score
- 1,043
The problem with your argument here is that you keep posting links that don't do what you claim, or imply, they do. Neither of your Mike Reiss links above, for example, claim a source or make any argument that the Patriots are interested in the guy, and the Projo entry doesn't either.
Go back.
Read.
We have lots of "experts" in this forum who have unequivocally stated that the Patriots do not have any interest in Tinoisamoa.
That's their opinion. They have no team sources to back that up.
We have Patriots Football Weekly and Mike Reiss stating their belief that Tinoisamoa is someone they believe the Patriots would take a look at.
I haven't "implied" anything. I'm simply pointing out a difference of opinion that as of today, when Reiss was talking about LB alternatives to Taylor, he (and SMT) continue to note that Tinoisamoa is someone of interest.
I think you're "implying" that by NOT naming "King Tut", Reiss is stating that the Patriots would be interested in him. I don't quite see the logic of that statement.
Nor do I see the logic that Reiss would be "implying" that the Patriots have no interest in Tinoisamoa by stating that Tinoisamoa is someone he believes would be on the Patriots radar.
Again, if you have a team source, say so. Until then I'll go with Reiss' "expertise".