Hmmmmm, lemme think.
I'd rather have twos 1sts and a 3rd than just a 2nd.
I think that that's exactly the kind of substanceless analysis of the situation that can be expected from the average fan. There's a reason why Belichick is the best in the league, though. Could he have got more for Cassel by holding out? Sure, but he doesn't look at moves in a vacuum like that.
This was always about how to improve the Patriots as much as possible over the course of the offseason, and that meant that Cassel's cap hit could not hold the team hostage. That meant dealing him as quickly as possible, so that we could get on with signing the other guys that we needed to sign.
Sure, Denver got someone to overpay for Cutler. On the other hand, the entire organization has been a sideshow for well over a month, there has been a huge distraction/sideshow, and the damage to McDaniels' and Xanders' authority might be permanent. The Broncos are going to absolutely suck next year, in large part because they had a bad team and were too busy doing damage control on a situation that was up in the air to make the improvements that the team needed.
To Xanders' and McDaniels' credit, they made out like bandits in a bad situation, but that doesn't make the Cutler situation even *remotely* comparable to Cassel's. We set out with a fundamentally different objective, with different things that we needed to accomplish (we're trying to win a SB
this year), and couldn't afford for this to become a sideshow. Not to mention that, leaguewide, Cutler is generally regarded as a better player than Cassel, with substantially more potential to evolve into an alltime great (not saying that I agree, but it is a factor).