Originally Posted by ShadyBrady
So by your logic the Giants were lucky and the Pats got screwed? Give me a break. The Pats are 0 and 2 in the Super Bowl post spy gate which by the way was 10 times worse than any bounty scandal because it threatened the integrity of the game. The New England Patriots were cheating and the leader of the operation was their Head Coach Bill Belichick. They were recording other teams at practice and using the footage to their advantage. It is easy to win games when you know your opponents' game plan.
What the Patriots did compromised the integrity of the game. The National Football League just kind of swept the issue under the rug. So roll your eyes all you want and say it didn't effect anything but like I said real football fans know the truth.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, is it?
Your tired old "haven't won since" (gee, I never heard that one before) logic is what I was replying to. It's the equivalent of saying I wore a green shirt and it rained, the next day I wore a black shirt and it was sunny; therefore wearing a green shirt causes it to rain. never did I say or imply that the Giants were lucky or the Pats got screwed.
Let me simplify it for you: what I was saying was that had the Patriots won (or if they win in the near future), are you going to sit here and tell me that you are suddenly going to change your mind, because they won a Super Bowl post 2006?
Obviously the answer is no.
Yet at the same time you want to use this as some type of "evidence" and "proof" to suit your biased viewpoint.
However, in your reply you do offer some proof of the mis-truths regarding the event. You ever hear the phrase about how if something gets repeated often enough, it becomes accepted as fact?
You fell right into that trap.
Here's a clue: the Patriots never recorded another team's practice. In the withchunt that ensued in 2007-08, unfounded accusations such as this one from people like you that wanted the witch to burnt at the stake in the village square got repeated so often that people accepted them as facts ... but there was no truth to them whatsoever.
You have zero objectivity because you've completely ignored facts in your zeal to convict someone you decided that you don't like ... most likely because he is the leader of the team that kept your favorite team from reaching their goals so many times.