- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.My dilemma starts with trying to figure out which subset of those 4 guys I prefer in the much more likely case that it's impossible to get all 4 of them.
Aye, there's the rub.
In my case, though, I would narrow the list to 3. I would take the best SS available at 58
That's where I am, too...and then having to winnow down further for 23/34, I end up with Gilbert & Barwin as my dream team, OL (OT if good value, but probably C/OG hoping for Eric Wood) at 47, and SS at 58.
IMHO there is no way Gilbert gets a sniff of the first round (and I am including pick # 34 in that group). I',m not against drafting Gilbert, I just think he has become a binky for too many fans on this board who have lost perspective on his value. It's reminiscent of how many here wanted to draft the SS from USC (name escapes me) in the first round a couple of years ago and ,IIRC, he fell to day 2 (the old day 2).
If BB wants Gilbert, I think there is an excellent chance he is there at #47, and personally I wouldn't want him until # 58 (or perhaps a slight trade-up).
At # 34, I think guys like Beatty, Brown, Butler, English, Barwin, Mack (even Laurinitis) will represent far greater value.
At #45, I would prefer guys like Smith, Robiskie, Chung, or Unger.
Around # 58, I would trust BB decide between Gilbert, Brace, Kruger
IMHO there is no way Gilbert gets a sniff of the first round (and I am including pick # 34 in that group). I',m not against drafting Gilbert, I just think he has become a binky for too many fans on this board who have lost perspective on his value. It's reminiscent of how many here wanted to draft the SS from USC (name escapes me) in the first round a couple of years ago and ,IIRC, he fell to day 2 (the old day 2).
If BB wants Gilbert, I think there is an excellent chance he is there at #47, and personally I wouldn't want him until # 58 (or perhaps a slight trade-up).
At # 34, I think guys like Beatty, Brown, Butler, English, Barwin, Mack (even Laurinitis) will represent far greater value.
At #45, I would prefer guys like Smith, Robiskie, Chung, or Unger.
Around # 58, I would trust BB decide between Gilbert, Brace, Kruger
NFL Draft 2009: Dan Pompei's top offensive tackles
By Dan Pompei
Tribune staff reporter
5:00 PM CDT, April 12, 2009
1. Jason Smith, Baylor
Fair enough, we all grade players differently. I'd be curious what it is about his game that you don't like that makes you think we've "lost perspective on his value." My comments on your value groups:
#34: If that's your #34 group, who did you take at 23? Beatty, Barwin & English are fine choices, assuming those positions weren't already addressed. I really like Butler, but I'm not convinced CB is "BPU" (best potential roster upgrade) there. Laurinaitis seems like a square peg for our round hole, Mack is a terrific player but a pure center, and I genuinely don't know which of the Browns you're referring to -- presumably Donald?
#47: Smith is a fine choice, Robiskie over-valued in the scramble for a "safe" WR, Chung not nearly as valuable as a super-long, super-athletic DL, Unger: like Chung, but it's close.
#58: Kruger is a major projection, Brace is fine here after you take Gilbert at #34.
If anything, this article presents the case for why the Patriots would *not* draft Beatty. The Patriots always go out of their way to stress that they want players who live, eat & sleep football. Clearly, football is far away from Beatty's priority in life.
The quote from teamate Keith Gray pretty much kills Beatty's chances that the Pats will be calling. To quote Gray, "He (Beatty) doesn't really watch the NFL, which is kind of funny. Being a football player, you'd figure he'd have a favorite team. I'm almost positive he can't even name six teams."