PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

What should the rules protecting QBs look like?

Next Opp: TBD
THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

CURRENT POPULAR DISCUSSIONS:
Is Mike’s job security in danger? (Vrabel + Russini)
Posted By: Joey007
June 09, 2026 at 7:13 am
Total Replies: 1235

# Of Users:155
IanmgteichMike the BritVrabelMayeWinThe Gr8estDarrylSSean Pa PatriotIcyPatriotCrazy Patriot Guy40yrpatsfanbresna
The Offense is Loaded
Posted By: mayoclinic
June 09, 2026 at 7:11 am
Total Replies: 122

# Of Users:48
mgteich40yrpatsfanTriumphcaptain stoneJoeSixPatZumaStatePatriot Missilep8rytsPatsFan2PatsFanInVa
TODAY'S MOST REACTED POSTS:
DoubleDeluxeSo much has changed in two years
2 Reactions
06/08 at 1:47 pm

By: DoubleDeluxe

Uptown2026 General NFL News/Discussion/Non-Patriots free agents
2 Reactions
06/08 at 6:52 pm

By: Uptown

TODAY'S TOP POSTERS:#
captain stone4 posts
Huckleberry13 posts
mayoclinic2 posts
goheels220022 posts
BobDigital2 posts
 

Should the rules protecting QBs be changed?

  • No. The QB is too vulnerable and valuable. They need all the protection they can get.

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • Yes. The automatic touching of the head penalty takes things too far.

    Votes: 7 70.0%
  • Yes. Get rid of the in-the-grasp rule. Last I checked QB was a football position.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes. Get rid of the rule preventing bodyslams. It hurts no matter what position you play.

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Yes. Stop letting QBs throw away the ball outside the pocket. Man up and run or take the loss.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes. One step is not enough time for a charging lineman to stop. Allow some interpretation.

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Yes for other reasons. (Post below.)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No for other reasons. (Post below.)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

pencilneckgeek

2nd Team Getting Their First Start
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
1,518
Reaction score
591
A quick poll. Do you like the rules or not?
 
I've no problem with banning low tackles on a player who is not running with the ball. The mechanics are totally different and QBs are much more vulnerable there. Similarly, it's easier to bodyslam a standing QB than a runner, so a little extra protection there is fine, but let's give the refs some opportunity to exercise judgment whether contact to the head is unnecessary roughness (just like they do elsewhere on the field) and let's get rid of arbitrary rules that make roll-out QBs immune to intentional grounding. As for in-the-grasp, it can be interpreted just like blowing the whistle for forward progress. If the play looks over, except for a little piling on, blow the whistle. Otherwise, let's play some football.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Patriots’ Maye an Upgrade for Brown? – ‘He Can Make Any Throw’
Patriots News 06-07, The Patriots Quickly Overhauled The Roster
GEORGE: What Do The Patriots Really Have In Brown?
MORSE: Brown 1st Day, Open Patriots OTA Practice, Raymond Berry Passes Away
McDaniels Praises Rookie Caleb Lomu’s Versatility, ‘Awesome Kid’
Patriots Coach Expected to Miss Time Ahead of Training Camp
TRANSCRIPT: Josh McDaniels Press Conference 6/2
Vrabel Addresses Christian Gonzalez’s Contract Situation, Practice Status
TRANSCRIPT: A.J. Brown Press Conference 6/2
Vrabel Calls TE Hill’s Injury “Devastating” – Confirms Veteran Will Miss 2026
Back
Top