robo
Just a few words for your and the rest of the Goodell defenders. Please answer a few questions for me.
1. Name one thing that Goodell has done since taking office that has not been detrimental to the Pats. Starting with the extraordinary punishment for the rules, the alleged investigation of the tapes leak to Fox, the destruction of the Pats tapes, the ignoring of the Jets taping the Pats, the accusation of collusion between the Colts and Titans and finally the lending of credibility to Walsh. I know one of you has come out with theory that Goodell is bending over backwards to prove he is not friends with Kraft but enough is enough.
You challenge my impressions of Krafts relationship with Goodell then I guess you must have intitmate knowledge yourself. I also believe that relationships can change and in this case it did. The reason that the pats didn't appeal the ruling was that Kraft thought he had a deal with Goodell to close the case, he didn't realize that Goodell lacked the integrity to keep his word.
As for the leaking of the Pats tape, I didn't say that Goodell did it but do you have plausible reason for the results of the investigation never to have been revealed.
I will agree with you that Goodell really came down hard on the 49ers who are a repeat offender. Boy, losing that 5th round draft pick really hurt them. I really can see any difference in the way they were treated and the Pats treatment.
Mark my words, Walsh will not come up with any tapes other that what the Pats already told Goodell, but will come up with some unsubstantiated stories about the Pats illegally using radio frequencies etc. and Goodell rather than putting to rest will start another investigation of the Pats.
I wonder what you will say then about the friendship between Kraft and Goodell.
I actually hope I am wrong and will be happy to to admit so here but I can smell a rat when one is there