one could make the same argument that if the NFL did not try to hamper the pats (point of emphasis on illegal contact and other things) that the pats would also have SB rings for
2006
2007
2011
2012
2013
(if the pats did not lose their 2008 1st rounder, and drafted say Matt Forte, we are talking about enough to change everything in 2011,2012, 2013)
I mean given the harshness the league exhibits towards the Pats, without it, we could be staring at 8 or 9 superbowls
the problem with the parity they try to instill is that when you have a front office like BB and Kraft and the way they work together for so long, that it is an unfair advantage....after BB, who's next in terms of tenure?