Yes, he was awesome at answering the phone and asking the other GMs if they wouldn't mind holding on for a minute while he asks his bosses what to do.
It was Wolf’s player evaluation system that they used, and Cowden is on record that the work that went into this draft started 18 months before it, and Vrabel, Cowden, and Streicher were only there for 3 months. You can hate Wolf all you want but pretending he’s just a secretary is stupid. I could respond by saying Cowden and Streicher didn’t do anything, but that would be just as stupid. The fact is that the front office as a whole had a great offseason, and trying to parse who did or said what, when we have absolutely no idea who did so is, once again, stupid.
Wolf Admits Patriots Have Shifted Draft Grading System to Packers’ Method
Wolf says system provides a 'clearer' view of things moving forward.
Ian Logue
February 27, 2024 at 4:57 pm ET
(PHOTO: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports)
Read Time: 2 minutes
One other interesting takeaway
from Tuesday’s press conference with Eliot Wolfis the fact that when it comes to the grading system the team is using, Wolf admitted that there was one key change that made things a little different moving forward for the Patriots.
According to Wolf, the previous Patriots system was more nuanced and more “role-based,” whereas Wolf told reporters that their new system is more of an overall view in terms of a player’s skillset, which is similar to how they did things during his time with the Packers.
“We changed the grading system. It’s a little bit more similar to what we did in Green Bay,” explained Wolf. “The previous Patriots system was more, ‘this is what the role is,’ and this is more, kind of, value-based. So I think it makes it a lot easier for scouts to rate guys and put them in a stack of like, ‘this guy’s the best,’ ‘this guy’s the worst,’ and everything in-between falls into place rather than sort of more nuanced approaches.
“I just think it accounts value better, and it also makes it easier for the scouts in the fall as well as in the spring to determine where guys will get drafted.”
That essentially provides a little clearer overhead view of things, as opposed to trying to look for certain traits that may or may not be effective.
Wolf went on to explain that the overall view still accounts for things like players who are a perimeter receiver, slot receiver, not just an overall view as an athlete. However, he simply pointed out that it’s not quite as specific as how things were viewed previously.
“I mean, we’ll still have slot receivers, perimeter receivers, things like that,” said Wolf. “To me, it’s a little bit less about the grading system and more about the process that we’ve put in place.”
Player development was also something he pointed out as a point of emphasis, which could signal that we’ll see the younger guys seeing action a little sooner than we may have seen them in the past.
“I think there’s going to be a little bit more reliance on playing young players,” said Wolf. “I think it’s really important in today’s football to be able to play young players and develop from within.”
(EDITOR’S NOTE: The above appeared in a recent notebook column here.)